Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on June 27, 2008
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008 101(3):366-373; doi:10.1093/bja/aen186
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/366    most recent
aen186v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rundshagen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Cortina, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rundshagen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Cortina, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Nervus medianus evoked potentials and bispectral index during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness{dagger}

I. Rundshagen1,*, J. Mast1, N. Mueller1, F. Pragst2, C. Spies1 and K. Cortina3

1 Department of Anaesthesiology
2 Department of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Charité, Berlin, Germany
3 Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

* Corresponding author: Department of Anesthesiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte und Virchow, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: ingrid.rundshagen{at}charite.de

Background: We investigated the relationship between median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and the bispectral index (BIS) during alternating periods of consciousness and propofol-induced unconsciousness.

Methods: Loss of consciousness (LOC) was repetitively induced by bolus injections of propofol in 24 patients undergoing elective surgery in spinal anaesthesia. SSEP and the BIS were recorded during LOC and recovery of consciousness (ROC). The level of consciousness was clinically assessed by the observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale. Propofol venous plasma concentrations were measured simultaneously.

Results: At LOC, all SSEPs latency components were prolonged (P<0.001), whereas amplitudes of the components ≥45 ms were smaller (P=0.008) and the BIS values were lower (P<0.001). None of the EEG variables regained baseline levels during ROC. Regression analyses revealed that the SSEP components (five latencies and five amplitudes) explained 33% of the variance when predicting ROC; the BIS explained 12%. The combination of SSEP and BIS explained 37% of variance in this patient sample. Propofol venous plasma concentration was 1.2 (0.8) µg ml–1 during LOC and 0.4 (0.5) µg ml–1 during ROC.

Conclusions: The present results indicate the usefulness of combining variables of the evoked and spontaneous EEG to measure different levels of consciousness, because the SSEP provide additional information beyond the BIS. Inter-individual variability of all the EEG variables limits their predictive potency of ROC after propofol infusion.

Keywords: anaesthesia, depth; anaesthetics i.v., propofol; brain, electroencephalography


{dagger} The results have been presented in part at the ‘Haupstadtkongress für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin’ in Berlin, Germany, 2005 and at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists in Atlanta, GA, USA, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.