Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on June 20, 2008

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aen169
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/390    most recent
aen169v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rochette, A.
Right arrow Articles by Capdevila, X.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rochette, A.
Right arrow Articles by Capdevila, X.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Avoiding propofol injection pain in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

A. Rochette1,*, A. F. Hocquet1, C. Dadure1, D. Boufroukh1, O. Raux1, J. F. Lubrano1, S. Bringuier1,2 and X. Capdevila1

1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care ‘A’, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
2 Department of Medical Statistics, Hôpital A. De Villeneuve, CHU de Montpellier, 371 Av. du doyen G. Giraud, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

* Corresponding author. E-mail: a-rochette{at}chu-montpellier.fr

Background: Pain on injection limits the use of propofol in children. The combination of lidocaine and propofol is widely used to reduce pain. A new solvent [medium-chain triglyceride (mct)/long-chain triglyceride (lct)] has been advocated to be less painful than standard (lct) propofol in adults, but no information is available of its usefulness in pre-school children. We designed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to assess injection pain with two different propofol emulsions, each given with or without lidocaine in children <7 yr.

Methods: A total of 160 ASA I–III children were randomly assigned to receive lct–propofol or mct/lct–propofol, 5 mg kg–1, with lidocaine 10 mg ml–1 or saline. The site and size of venous cannulation and restlessness before injection were recorded in each patient. A pain score graded 0–6 was established based on spontaneous verbal and motor reaction during injection, each graded 0–3. Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Median pain scores decreased in all groups compared with lct–propofol–saline (P<0.001) and were least in the lct/mct–propofol–lidocaine group (P<0.001). Painless injection (score, 0–2) occurred in 92.5% of patients in the mct/lct–propofol–lidocaine group compared with 41–77% in the others (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Mct/lct–propofol caused significantly less pain than lct–propofol in preschool children. Mixing of lidocaine with mct/lct–propofol resulted in a further significant decrease, virtually eliminating the pain on injection.

Keywords: anaesthesia, paediatric; anaesthetic techniques, i.v. bolus; anaesthetics i.v., propofol; pain, injection; solubility, lipid


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Injection pain due to propofol in children and the ethics of placebo
Neil S. Morton
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 31 Aug 2008 [Full text]
Ethics is everyone's business
Gordon B Drummond
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 5 Sep 2008 [Full text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.