Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on May 28, 2008

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aen126
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/2/194    most recent
aen126v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buettner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sakka, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buettner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sakka, S. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Influence of systolic-pressure-variation-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport{dagger}

M. Buettner1, W. Schummer1, E. Huettemann2, S. Schenke3, N. van Hout1 and S. G. Sakka4,*,{ddagger}

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Worms, Worms, Germany
3 Department of Informatics, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
4 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Medical Center Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimerstr. 200, D-51109 Cologne, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: sakkas{at}kliniken-koeln.de

Background: Dynamic variables, for example, systolic pressure variation (SPV), are superior to filling pressures for assessing fluid responsiveness. We analysed the effects of SPV-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and perfusion when compared with routine care.

Methods: Eighty patients (44 female and 36 male) undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to a control group [n=40, mean age 66 (SD 10), range 40–84 yr] or SPV group [n=40, age 61 (16), range 26–100 yr] in which intraoperative fluid management was guided by SPV (trigger: SPV>10%). Central venous O2 saturation (ScvO2), lactate and bilirubin, creatinine, indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR), and gastric mucosal CO2 tension were measured after induction of anaesthesia, after 3, 6, 12, and 24 h.

Results: Patient characteristics, duration of surgery [5.8 (2.5) vs 5.4 (2.5) h], and infusion volumes (median 4865 vs 4330 ml) were comparable between the groups. At 3 and 6 h, SPV (P=0.04, P=0.01) and {Delta}down (P=0.005, P=0.01) were significantly higher in the control group. Oxygen transport and organ function were comparable: baseline and 24 h values for ICG-PDR: 28.5 (7.9) and 22.7 (7.8) vs 23.9 (6.9) and 26.1 (5.9)% min–1, 77.7 (6.6) and 72.6 (5.5) vs 79.3 (7.1) and 72.8 (6.7)% for ScvO2 and 1.0 (0.4) and 1.2 (0.6) vs 0.9 (0.2) and 1.3 (0.5) mmol litre–1 for lactate. Length of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and mortality were comparable.

Conclusions: In comparison with routine care, intraoperative SPV-guided treatment was associated with slightly increased fluid adminstration whereas organ perfusion and function was similar.

Keywords: arterial pressure, measurement; complications, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; fluid, balance; heart, myocardial function; monitoring, intraoperative; surgery, abdominal


{dagger} This work was presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), Berlin, 2004, and the International Congress of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (ISICM), Brussels, 2005.

{ddagger} Declaration of interest. Dr S.G.S. has received honoraria from and is a member of the Medical Advisory Board of Pulsion Medical Systems AG, Munich, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Pestel, K. Fukui, V. Hartwich, P. M. Schumacher, A. Vogt, L. B. Hiltebrand, A. Kurz, Y. Fujita, D. Inderbitzin, and D. Leibundgut
Automatic Algorithm for Monitoring Systolic Pressure Variation and Difference in Pulse Pressure
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2009; 108(6): 1823 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

SPV - Guided fluid management
RESHMA A BHOSALE
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 24 Oct 2008 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.