Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on May 29, 2008

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aen125
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/2/166    most recent
aen125v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, J. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of central venous and external jugular venous pressures during repair of proximal femoral fracture{dagger}

A. D. Leonard1,*, C. M. Allsager2, J. L. Parker2, A. Swami3 and J. P. Thompson1

1 Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Division of Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Management, Victoria Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
2 University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
3 Kettering General Hospital, Rothwell Road, Kettering NN16 8UZ, UK

* Corresponding author. E-mail: antonleonard{at}doctors.org.uk

Background: External jugular venous pressure (EJVP) is a close estimate of central venous pressure (CVP) in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the supine position, but the effects of spontaneous respiration and posture on this relationship are not known. In this study, we compared CVP with EJVP measurements in 36 patients undergoing repair of proximal femoral fracture breathing spontaneously in the supine or lateral positions.

Methods: A standard general anaesthetic was administered with patients breathing spontaneously via a laryngeal mask airway and i.v. fluids administered according to an algorithm guided by CVP measurements. CVP and EJVP catheters were placed on the right side of the neck where possible.

Results: In the supine position, 185 paired measurements of CVP and EJVP and 79 in the lateral position were recorded by a blinded observer during surgery. In the supine position, the mean difference between CVP and EJVP was –0.3 mm Hg (limits of agreement –2.6 to +1.9 mm Hg, 95% confidence intervals for both upper and lower limits of agreement, respectively, were –2.9 to –2.2 and +1.6 to +2.2 mm Hg). In the lateral position, the mean difference was –1.2 mm Hg (limits of agreement –5.8 to +3.8 mm Hg, 95% confidence intervals –6.8 to –4.5 and +2.7 to +4.9 mm Hg).

Conclusions: These data suggest that EJVP is an acceptable estimate of CVP in the supine position. Agreement was poor in the lateral position but was stronger for estimates of trend rather than absolute values. This could be explained by the direct effects of posture.

Keywords: surgery, orthopaedic; veins, jugular


{dagger} Presented at the Anaesthetic Research Society, Dundee, June 2006, and published in part as an abstract in the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006; 97: 431–42.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.