BJA Advance Access originally published online on September 14, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(5):662-665; doi:10.1093/bja/aem262
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of the implementation of NICE guidelines for ultrasound guidance on the complication rates associated with central venous catheter placement in patients presenting for routine surgery in a tertiary referral centre
1 Department of Anaesthesia, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
2 Department of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Division of Surgery, Oncology, Reproductive Biology and Anaesthetics, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author. E-mail: timothy.wigmore{at}rmh.nhs.uk
Background: The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines of 2002 recommended the use of ultrasound (US) for central venous catheterization in order to minimize complications associated with central line placement. An ongoing audit of line placement by anaesthetists in the theatre complex of a tertiary referral centre looked at the associated complication rates. The objective of the study was to compare complication rates pre- and post-implementation of NICE guidelines.
Methods: This prospective, single centre audit looked at all patients in whom a central venous catheter was placed for surgery. Complication rates were assessed for procedures that were performed pre- and post-implementation of NICE guidelines. In total, 438 patients were identified for the study, and the procedures were performed either by trainee or by consultant anaesthetists.
Results: The pre- and post-implementation complication rates were 10.5% (16/152) and 4.6% (13/284), respectively, representing an absolute risk reduction of 5.9% (95% CI 0.5–11.3%). Comparison of those procedures in which US was used when compared with the landmark technique after implementation found a reduction of 6.9% in complications (95% CI 1.4–12.4%). The reduction in complication rates was larger for specialist registrars than for consultants (11.2% vs 1.6%).
Conclusions: The implementation of NICE guidelines has been associated with a significant reduction in complication rates in our tertiary referral centre. In the light of the cross-speciality evidence of US superiority and our results, it is imperative that routine use of US guidance becomes more widespread.
Keywords: complications, catheter misplacement; complications, pneumothorax; equipment, cannulae intravascular; lung, pneumothorax; measurement techniques, ultrasound; monitoring, ultrasound; surgery, preoperative, non-cardiac; veins, complications, cannulation, jugular, jugular, cannulation, venepuncture
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. D. Leonard, C. M. Allsager, J. L. Parker, A. Swami, and J. P. Thompson Comparison of central venous and external jugular venous pressures during repair of proximal femoral fracture Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 166 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Colvin and A. M. Moller Volume 100: clinical investigations: where next? Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2008; 100(4): 433 - 435. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- NICE guidelines for cental venous catheter placement, are some people resistant to change?
- Arun Krishnamurthy, et al.
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 3 Dec 2007 [Full text]
- Effect of the implementation of NICE guidelines for ultrasound guidance on the complication rates as
- Basil Almahdi, et al.
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 3 Dec 2007 [Full text]
- Use of ultrasound for Central venous line placement-A different perspective
- Ravish jeeji
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 8 Dec 2007 [Full text]
- Training and Availability of US
- Balamurugan Ramalingam
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 11 Dec 2007 [Full text]
- Unintended consequencies of NICE Guidelines
- Andrew Higgs, et al.
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 12 Dec 2007 [Full text]