BJA Advance Access originally published online on July 24, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(4):484-492; doi:10.1093/bja/aem199
Continuous cardiac output during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: pulse-contour analyses vs pulmonary artery thermodilution
1 The Interventional Centre
2 Department of Biostatistics
3 Department of Anaesthesiology
4 Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Centre, Oslo, Norway
5 Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
* Corresponding author: The Interventional Centre, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Centre, NO-0027 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: per.steinar.halvorsen{at}rikshospitalet.no
Background: No gold standard method exists for monitoring continuous cardiac output (CO). In this study, the agreement between the two most frequently used methods, PiCCO pulse-contour analysis (PCCO) and STAT pulmonary artery thermodilution (STAT-CO), was assessed during multiple-vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.
Methods: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. Two time periods were defined during surgery; Period 1 included positioning of the heart and stabilizer device and Period 2 included the coronary occlusion. Measurements were obtained every minute during both periods. The agreement for the continuous CO and the change in CO (
CO) was estimated using the Bland–Altman method.
Results: Significant changes in mean arterial pressure (
MAP), central venous saturation, PCCO and STAT-CO were seen only during Period 1.
MAP correlated only with changes in PCCO, (P < 0.001, r = 0.60). The mean difference (2SD) between PCCO and STAT-CO ranged from – 0.29 (1.82) to – 0.71 (2.57) litre min–1, and the percentage error varied from 32 to 50%. For the CO measurements, the limits of agreements did not differ between Period 1 and Period 2. In contrast, for the
CO measurements, the limits of agreements were wider in Period 1 than in the more haemodynamically stable Period 2.
Conclusions: PCCO and STAT-CO show large discrepancies in CO during OPCAB surgery. Clinically acceptable agreement was seen only for trends in CO during haemodynamically stable periods.
Keywords: anaesthesia, cardiovascular; heart, cardiac output; measurement techniques, pulse-contour analysis; measurement techniques, thermodilution; surgery, coronary artery bypass
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Bergsland, P. S. Lingaas, H. Skulstad, P. K. Hol, P. S. Halvorsen, R. Andersen, M. Smastuen, R. Lundblad, J. Svennevig, K. Andersen, et al. Intracoronary Shunt Prevents Ischemia in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 54 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- Realtime Haemodynamic Monitoring During Beating Heart Coronaory Bypass Grafting
- John George George Cherian
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 11 Oct 2007 [Full text]
- Re: Realtime Haemodynamic Monitoring During Beating Heart Coronaory Bypass Grafting
- Per S Halvorsen
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 26 Oct 2007 [Full text]
