Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on June 18, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(3):396-403; doi:10.1093/bja/aem168
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/396    most recent
aem168v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michelet, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kerbaul, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michelet, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kerbaul, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Adding ketamine to morphine for patient-controlled analgesia after thoracic surgery: influence on morphine consumption, respiratory function, and nocturnal desaturation

P. Michelet1,*, C. Guervilly1, A. Hélaine1, J. P. Avaro2, D. Blayac1, F. Gaillat1, T. Dantin3, P. Thomas2 and F. Kerbaul1

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
2 Department of Thoracic Surgery
3 Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Sainte Marguerite, 13274 Marseille Cedex 9, France

* Corresponding author. E-mail: pierre.michelet{at}ap-hm.fr

Background: I.V. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine is often used for postoperative analgesia after thoracic surgery, but the required doses may increase postoperative respiratory disorders. Adjunction of ketamine could reduce both doses and related respiratory side-effects.

Methods: The main objective of this prospective, randomized double-blinded study was to evaluate the influence of adding ketamine to PCA on morphine consumption and postoperative respiratory disorders. Consecutive patients undergoing lobectomy (n = 50) were randomly assigned to receive, during the postoperative period, either i.v. morphine 1 mg ml–1 or morphine with ketamine 1 mg ml–1 for each. Morphine consumption was evaluated by cumulative doses every 12 h for the three postoperative days. Postoperative respiratory disorders were assessed by spirometric evaluation and recording of nocturnal desaturation.

Results: The adjunction of ketamine resulted in a significant reduction in cumulative morphine consumption as early as the 36th postoperative hour [43 (SD 18) vs 32 (14) mg, P = 0.03] with a similar visual analogue scale. In the morphine group, the percentage of time with desaturation < 90% was higher during the three nights [1.80 (0.21–6.37) vs 0.02 (0–0.13), P < 0.001; 2.15 (0.35–8.65) vs 0.50 (0.01–1.30), P = 0.02; 2.46 (0.57–5.51) vs 0.55 (0.21–1.00), P = 0.02]. The decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s was less marked in the ketamine group at the first postoperative day [1.04 (0.68–1.22) litre vs 1.21 (1.10–0.70) litre, P = 0.039].

Conclusions: Adding small doses of ketamine to morphine in PCA devices decreases the morphine consumption and may improve respiratory disorders after thoracic surgery.

Keywords: analgesia, patient-controlled; analgesics, postoperative; anaesthetics i.v., ketamine; lung, respiratory function; surgery, thoracic


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Heidegger, M. Nuebling, D. Saal, and G. Kreienbuhl
Patient-centred outcomes in clinical research: does it really matter?
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.