Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on May 22, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(2):266-269; doi:10.1093/bja/aem129
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/266    most recent
aem129v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernandez, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rowbotham, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernandez, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rowbotham, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effect of pulsed magnetic field therapy on pain reported by human volunteers in a laboratory model of acute pain{dagger}

M. I. Fernandez1, P. J. Watson2 and D. J. Rowbotham2,*

1 University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
2 Department of Health Sciences and Division of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK

* Corresponding author: Division of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK. E-mail: djr8{at}leicester.ac.uk

Background: Pulsed magnetic field therapy (PMFT) is a non-invasive, simple technique used extensively for the treatment of muscle pain. However, evidence to support its use from well-designed, clinical, or experimental studies is sparse.

Methods: We have utilized an acute pain model to perform a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover-study on 10 male (18–40 yr) volunteers. Pain was elicited by infusion of hypertonic saline 5% into the brachioradialis muscle of the non-dominant arm on two occasions, at least 1 week apart. Subjects received active or sham PMFT for 30 min in a randomized order delivered by two identical, commercially available machines (PulsePack 6000, Quantum Techniks). The active machine delivered a M-wave magnetic pulse (1.25 Hz, 3 ms width, 600 Gauss); the sham device was deactivated and delivered no magnetic energy. Pain was assessed at 15-s intervals, and area under the visual analogue score (VAS) pain curve (AUCp) was calculated using the trapezoid method.

Results: There were no significant differences in mean VAS pain scores between the two machines at any time. In addition, there were no significant differences with respect to mean (SEM) maximum pain score [sham 60 (8), active 63 (9) mm; P = 0.66, 95% CI –18 to 12 mm] or AUCp [sham 463 (50), active 499 (90); P = 0.64, 95% CI –201 to 129].

Conclusions: We conclude that, using the electromagnetic characteristics of the machine in this study, the PMFT had no effect on pain in our experimental model. More work is required to provide an evidence base in support of the use of this technique for pain.

Keywords: analgesic techniques, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy; pain, acute; pain, experimental


{dagger} Data from this study were presented at the Anaesthetic Research Society meeting, Loughborough, November 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.