Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on June 6, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(2):262-265; doi:10.1093/bja/aem145
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/262    most recent
aem145v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oh, A. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oh, A. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of desflurane with sevoflurane for the incidence of oculocardiac reflex in children undergoing strabismus surgery

A. Y. Oh1, M. J. Yun1, H. J. Kim1 and H. S. Kim2,*

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongun-Dong, Chongro-Gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea

* Corresponding author. E-mail: dami0605{at}snu.ac.kr

Background: The oculocardiac reflex (OCR) is frequently observed during strabismus surgery. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the effect of sevoflurane and desflurane on the incidence of OCR.

Methods: After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent from parents, we enrolled 237 paediatric patients, aged 2–10 yr, undergoing strabismus surgery. No premedication was given. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental and rocuronium. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two anaesthetic regimens. Group S (n = 123) received sevoflurane and Group D (n = 114) received desflurane, both with 60% N2O/O2 for maintenance of anaesthesia. The OCR was defined as a ≥ 20% decrease in heart rate (HR) from baseline values obtained immediately before muscle manipulation. If the HR did not increase after release of muscle tension, atropine 0.01 mg kg–1 was administered.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, body weight, and the number of muscles operated upon. The mean values of baseline HR were 123 (16) min–1 in Group S and 121 (18) in Group D (NS). The minimum HR was 106 (22) min–1 in Group S and 103 (21) in Group D (NS). There was no difference in the incidence of OCR between sevoflurane (26.0%) and desflurane (28.0%) anaesthesia.

Conclusions: Both agents can be used safely during strabismus surgery in paediatric patients.

Keywords: anaesthetics volatile, desflurane; anaesthetics volatile, sevoflurane; children; strabismus


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Yi and D. Jee
Influence of the anaesthetic depth on the inhibition of the oculocardiac reflex during sevoflurane anaesthesia for paediatric strabismus surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 234 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.