Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 98(5):628-634; doi:10.1093/bja/aem060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turnbull, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mills, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turnbull, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mills, G. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Intra-abdominal pressure measurement: validation of intragastric pressure as a measure of intra-abdominal pressure

D. Turnbull1,*, S. Webber2, C. H. Hamnegard3 and G. H. Mills2

1 Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, Sheffield University, UK
2 Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

* Corresponding author: Academic Anaesthetic Unit, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK. E-mail: cahilturnbull{at}doctors.org.uk

Background: The diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome depends upon the demonstration of an elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Direct measures of IAP are impractical in the critical care unit; intravesical pressure (IVP) and intragastric pressure (IGP) should represent acceptable surrogate measures. IVP is the preferred measure of IAP in critical care. We considered that IGP represents a practical alternative. The objective of this preliminary study was to observe the relationship between IGP and IAP.

Methods: After Institutional Ethics Board approval, 29 patients having elective laparoscopic surgery were recruited. IAP was measured directly via the abdominal trochar. This was compared with IGP measured via a commercial balloon catheter placed into the stomach.

Results: Measured IGP was always more positive than IAP; both showed linear correlation (r2>0.9). When IGP was calibrated against IAP, an estimated difference between the IGP and IAP of ± 2.5 mm Hg for 95% of the measurements was seen.

Conclusions: The study demonstrates the strength of the relationship between IGP and IAP in normal individuals. Application of IGP measurement in the critical care patient is necessary to demonstrate its suitability for continuous IAP assessment.

Keywords: Abdomen, intra-abdominal pressure; complications, abdominal compartment syndrome; monitoring, intra-gastric pressure, intra-abdominal pressure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
J D Hunter
Abdominal compartment syndrome: an under-diagnosed contributory factor to morbidity and mortality in the critically ill
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2008; 84(992): 293 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.