Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 98(3):302-316; doi:10.1093/bja/ael386
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME/CE:
Take the course for this article:
BJA: March 2007
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ensor, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ensor, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis

M. Naguib1,*,{dagger}, A. F. Kopman3,{dagger} and J. E. Ensor2

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
2 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
3 New York Medical College, Department of Anesthesiology, Saint Vincent's Hospital Manhattan, New York, NY, USA

* Corresponding author: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Unit 409, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA. E-mail: naguib{at}mdanderson.org

We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effect of intraoperative monitoring of neuromuscular function on the incidence of postoperative residual curarisation (PORC). PORC has been considered present when a patient has a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of < 0.7 or < 0.9. We analysed data from 24 trials (3375 patients) that were published between 1979 and 2005. We excluded data on mivacurium from this meta-analysis because only three studies had examined the incidence of PORC associated with its use. Long- and intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs had been given to 662 and 2713 patients, respectively. Neuromuscular function was monitored in 823 patients (24.4%). A simple peripheral nerve stimulator was used in 543 patients, and an objective monitor was used in 280. The incidence of PORC was found to be significantly lower after the use of intermediate neuromuscular blocking drugs. We could not demonstrate that the use of an intraoperative neuromuscular function monitor decreased the incidence of PORC.

Keywords: complications, postoperative; meta-analysis, postoperative residual curarisation; monitoring, neuromuscular function; neuromuscular block


{dagger} Declaration of interest. Drs Naguib and Kopman have worked as consultants on an ad hoc basis with Organon Pharmaceuticals (Roseland, NJ, USA) and Avera Pharmaceuticals (San Diego, CA, USA). They are currently involved with multicentre phase IIIa studies of sugammadex.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. J. Brull, M. Naguib, and R. D. Miller
Residual Neuromuscular Block: Rediscovering the Obvious
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 11 - 14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. S. Murphy, J. W. Szokol, J. H. Marymont, S. B. Greenberg, M. J. Avram, and J. S. Vender
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade and Critical Respiratory Events in the Postanesthesia Care Unit
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 130 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. R. Webster
Volume 100: The review article
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2008; 100(3): 285 - 287.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Naguib
Sugammadex May Replace Best Clinical Practice: A Misconception
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1506 - 1507.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Claudius, H. Karacan, and J. Viby-Mogensen
Prolonged residual paralysis after a single intubating dose of rocuronium
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 514 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
F. Donati
Sugammadex: an opportunity for more thinking or more cookbook medicine?/Le sugammadex: une occasion de reflechir ou de suivre la recette?
Can J Anesth, September 1, 2007; 54(9): 689 - 695.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Viby-Mogensen, C. Claudius, L. I. Eriksson, M. Naguib, A. F. Kopman, and J. E. Ensor
Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarization
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2007; 99(2): 297 - 299.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation
Jørgen Viby-Mogensen, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1 May 2007 [Full text]
Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a response
Mohamed Naguib, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 11 May 2007 [Full text]
Mathematics of the mind, risks and hermeneutics may help the understanding of the neuromuscular moni
Rogerio L R Videira
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 29 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Proposed Models Need Validation
Mohamed Naguib, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 11 Jul 2007 [Full text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.