Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on September 13, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 97(6):858-861; doi:10.1093/bja/ael249
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/6/858    most recent
ael249v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawaraguchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawaraguchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of caudal block using ropivacaine 0.2% with or without fentanyl 1 µg kg–1 in children

Y. Kawaraguchi1,*, T. Otomo1, C. Ota1, N. Uchida1, A. Taniguchi1 and S. Inoue2

1 Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Miyagi Children's Hospital Sendai, Japan
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Nara Medical University Kashihara, Japan

*Corresponding author: Department of Anaesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan. E-mail: kawaraguchi{at}bea.hi-ho.ne.jp

Background. It has been reported that ropivacaine produces vasoconstriction in contrast to vasodilation produced by bupivacaine. It is possible that additives to ropivacaine can provide further analgesic advantages compared with bupivacaine. We thus evaluated whether the addition of fentanyl to ropivacaine prolonged the duration of analgesia after a single shot caudal block.

Methods. A total of 36 children undergoing surgical procedures below the umbilicus were randomly allocated to one of two groups: Group F received ropivacaine 0.2%, 1 ml kg–1 with fentanyl 1 µg kg–1 and Group S received ropivacaine 0.2%, 1 ml kg–1 with saline. The analgesic effect of the caudal block was evaluated using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and sedation was assessed using the Steward score at 30 min after extubation and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h. The first analgesic requirement time and side-effects in a 24 h period were also recorded.

Results. There were no differences in characteristics between the groups. The end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane at extubation in Group F was significantly lower than in Group S. However, there was no significant difference in time from discontinuation of the volatile anaesthetics to tracheal extubation. No statistical differences were found in the CHEOPS and Steward score, and the time to first analgesia. The incidence of postoperative vomiting was not significantly different.

Conclusion. We found that the addition of fentanyl 1 µg kg–1 to ropivacaine 0.2% for caudal analgesia provides no further analgesic advantages over ropivacaine 0.2% alone.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Caudal fentanyl and Intravenous pentazocine in children
Pradeep Orakkan
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 27 Nov 2006 [Full text]
Re: Caudal fentanyl and Intravenous pentazocine in children
Yoshitaka Kawaraguchi
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 7 Dec 2006 [Full text]
Can the null hypothesis be accepted?
Christos K Dragoumanis, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 7 Dec 2006 [Full text]
Re: Can the null hypothesis be accepted?
Yoshitaka Kawaraguchi
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 19 Dec 2006 [Full text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.