Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on August 23, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 97(5):676-680; doi:10.1093/bja/ael235
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/676    most recent
ael235v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandin, P.
Right arrow Articles by D'hollander, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandin, P.
Right arrow Articles by D'hollander, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Bispectral index is a topographically dependent variable in patients receiving propofol anaesthesia

P. Pandin1,*, N. Van Cutsem1, T. Tuna1 and A. D'hollander2

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Hospital, Free University of Brussels Brussels, Belgium
2 Division of Anesthesiology, Cantonal University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland

*Corresponding author: Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Hospital, Lennik drive 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: ppandin{at}ulb.ac.be

Background. As very strong agreement has been reported between bispectral index (BIS) values measured from the occipital and frontal skull areas, we compared BIS values measured from central and parietal areas with those from frontal area to investigate whether BIS is really a topographically dependent or topographically independent variable.

Methods. Twenty patients, ASA I–II, non-obese, aged 18–62 yr and with no neurological disorders were enrolled. Based on the 10–20 international landmarks, five silver dome electrodes were positioned: F7, C3, P7, Cz (common reference) and Fp1 (ground). Using frontal (F7–Cz), central (C3–Cz) and parietal (P7–Cz) electrode montages, the corresponding BIS values were simultaneously recorded with an Aspect A-1000 monitor (software v3.12). The BIS values were recorded at the propofol concentration allowing laryngeal mask insertion, which was maintained during the 10 min data collection period in absence of additional external stimuli. Data were analysed using the Kruskall–Wallis, Wilcoxon paired sign with Bonferroni correction, Bland–Altman and linear correlation tests.

Results. At the predicted effect target propofol concentration 4–8 µg ml–1, the 10 min mean BIS (median [min–max]) were 32 [20–44], 46 [28–68] and 58 [41–72] for the frontal, central and parietal leads, respectively. Differences between these BIS recordings were statistically significant (P<0.0001, Kruskall–Wallis; P<0.005, Wilcoxon paired sign test).

Conclusions. The present results provide evidence that BIS index is a topographically dependent variable in patients receiving propofol anaesthesia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.