Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on September 4, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 97(5):640-646; doi:10.1093/bja/ael217
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/640    most recent
ael217v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C.T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of the effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and i.v. infusion with lidocaine on cytokine response, postoperative pain and bowel function in patients undergoing colonic surgery

C. P. Kuo1, S. W. Jao2, K. M. Chen3, C. S. Wong1, C. C. Yeh1, M. J. Sheen1 and C.T. Wu1,*

1 Department of Anesthesiology Taipei, Taiwan
2 Department of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center Taipei, Taiwan
3 Department of Statistics, Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ, USA

*Corresponding author: Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, #325, Section 2, Chenggung Road, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail: wuchingtang{at}msn.com

Background. Both thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and i.v. lidocaine were able to decrease postoperative pain and duration of ileus. We compared TEA and i.v. lidocaine (IV) regarding their effects on cytokines, pain and bowel function after colonic surgery.

Methods. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups. TEA group had lidocaine 2 mg kg–1 followed by 3 mg kg–1 h–1 epidurally and an equal volume of i.v. normal saline. The IV group received the same amount of lidocaine i.v. and normal saline epidurally. The control group received normal saline via both routes. These regimens were started 30 min before surgery and were continued throughout. Blood cytokines were measured at scheduled times within 72 h.

Results. Both TEA and IV groups had better pain relief. The total consumptions using patient-controlled epidural analgesia were 81.6 (6.5), 55.0 (5.3) and 45.6 (3.9) ml (P<0.01) and the times of flatus passage were 50.2 (4.9), 60.2 (5.8) and 71.7 (4.7) h (P<0.01) in the TEA, IV and control groups, respectively. The TEA group exhibited the best postoperative pain relief and the least cytokine surge. The IV group experienced better pain relief and less cytokine release than the control group.

Conclusions. The TEA lidocaine had better pain relief, lower opioid consumption, earlier return of bowel function and lesser production of cytokines than IV lidocaine during 72 h after colonic surgery; IV group was better than the control group.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cleveland Clinic Journal of MedicineHome page
M. D. JOHNSON and R. M. WALSH
Current therapies to shorten postoperative ileus
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, November 1, 2009; 76(11): 641 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
I. Z. Yardeni, B. Beilin, E. Mayburd, Y. Levinson, and H. Bessler
The Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine on Postoperative Pain and Immune Function
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1464 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
O. Ahlers, I. Nachtigall, J. Lenze, A. Goldmann, E. Schulte, C. Hohne, G. Fritz, and D. Keh
Intraoperative thoracic epidural anaesthesia attenuates stress-induced immunosuppression in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2008; 101(6): 781 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
R. H. Gannon
Current strategies for preventing or ameliorating postoperative ileus: A multimodal approach
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., October 15, 2007; 64(20_Supplement_13): S8 - S12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Lentschener, P. Tostivint, P. F. White, M. E. Gentili, and Y. Ozier
Opioid-Induced Sedation in the Postanesthesia Care Unit Does Not Insure Adequate Pain Relief: A Case-Control Study
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 1143 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.