Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on August 23, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 97(4):517-524; doi:10.1093/bja/ael192
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/4/517    most recent
ael192v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shibuta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mashimo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shibuta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mashimo, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ketamine and thiopental sodium: individual and combined neuroprotective effects on cortical cultures exposed to NMDA or nitric oxide

S. Shibuta*, S. Varathan and T. Mashimo

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine D7, Osaka University 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Japan

*Corresponding author. E-mail: shibuta{at}anes.med.osaka-u.ac.jp

Background. An N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) blocker, ketamine, has been shown to be neuroprotective both in vivo and in vitro. However, ketamine is not commonly recommended for use in patients suffering from cerebral ischaemia because of its adverse neurological effects. We hypothesized that combined administration of ketamine and thiopental sodium (TPS) would be highly effective in protecting cerebral cortical neurones from ischaemia, with possibly reduced dosages.

Methods. We examined the degree of neuroprotection provided by various concentrations of ketamine and TPS, alone and in combination, in cortical cultures exposed to NMDA or a nitric oxide-releasing compound (NOC-5) for 24 h. The survival rate (SR) of E16 Wistar rat cortical neurones was evaluated using photomicrographs before and after exposure to these compounds.

Results. The SRs of cortical neurones exposed to 30 µM NMDA or NOC-5 were 15.0 (3.8)%, 12.8 (3.1)%, respectively. Higher doses (5, 10 and 50 µM) but not lower doses (<1 µM) of ketamine improved SRs [57.9 (2.2)%, 61.1 (5.4)%, 76.7 (3.0)%, respectively] against NMDA but not NOC. Enhanced survival was observed with combined administration of 5 or 10 µM ketamine and 50 µM TPS [SR 71.3 (4.8)%, 74.7 (3.7)%, respectively, P<0.05 if ketamine alone, P<0.01 if TPS alone], against NMDA-induced neurotoxicity in vitro. Only the highest dose of TPS (50 µM) improved survival after NOC exposure. This neuroprotection was not influenced by ketamine.

Conclusions. These data indicate that a low, clinically relevant dose of ketamine offer significant neuroprotection during prolonged exposure to NMDA but not to NOC. Combinations of reduced doses of ketamine and TPS exhibited enhanced neuroprotection against NMDA-induced neurotoxicity. Hence, combinations of these two common i.v. anaesthetics agents could be developed to protect the brain from ischaemia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Smith and R. P. Mahajan
Clinical neuroscience: relevance to current practice
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2007; 99(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.