Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on June 21, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 97(3):315-319; doi:10.1093/bja/ael151
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/3/315    most recent
ael151v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coburn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rossaint, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coburn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rossaint, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Influence of a 30-min break on divided attention and working memory in resident anaesthetists on daily routine

M. Coburn1,*, D. Henzler1, J.-H. Baumert1, B. Fimm2, B. Drüke3 and R. Rossaint1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Aachen of the RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstreet 30, D-52072 Aachen, Germany
2 Department of Neuropsychology, University Hospital Aachen of the RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstreet 30, D-52072 Aachen, Germany
3 Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital Aachen of the RWTH Aachen Pauwelsstreet 30, D-52072 Aachen, Germany

*Corresponding author. E-mail: mcoburn{at}ukaachen.de

Background. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that a standard 30-min break in a routine 7.5 h period of work makes a difference in cognitive function.

Methods. In a double-blinded, cross-over trial 30 residents in anaesthesia were randomized to receive or not to receive a 30-min break between the assessment times of 07:30 and 14:00. in a normal working day. After at least 28 days the test was repeated with each resident in the opposite group. Primary outcome measure was the Test for Attentional Performance with the subtest of working memory and divided attention. Secondary outcomes are the Stanford Sleepiness Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory test.

Results. The sleep, caffeine and nicotine habits in both groups were comparable. There was no difference between the two groups in the Test for Attentional Performance, Stanford Sleepiness Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The correlation between recovery through sleep and sleep disturbance in the night before investigation to the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (P<0.001 and P=0.003) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (P<0.001 and P=0.001) at the 07:30 assessment is significant. For the 14:00 assessment the only significant correlation is between the recovery through sleep with the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (P=0.04) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (P=0.05).

Conclusion. A 30-min break during a 7.5 h daily routine did not influence cognitive function tests.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Coburn, J.-H. Baumert, D. Roertgen, V. Thiel, M. Fries, M. Hein, O. Kunitz, B. Fimm, and R. Rossaint
Emergence and early cognitive function in the elderly after xenon or desflurane anaesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2007; 98(6): 756 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.