BJA Advance Access originally published online on February 24, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96(4):502-507; doi:10.1093/bja/ael024
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A comparison of two techniques for ultrasound guided infraclavicular block
1Department of Anesthesiology, Strong Memorial Hospital Rochester, NY, USA
2Department of Anesthesiology, Lindsay House Surgery Center at Linden Oaks Penfield, NY, USA
*Corresponding author: Box 604, Strong Memorial Hospitals, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. E-mail: paul_bigeleisen{at}urmc.rochester.edu
Background. There is some debate about the proper site and arm position and the direction of the needle for the performance of ultrasound guided infraclavicular block.
Methods. Using ultrasound, we compared the ease and success rate of a medial or a lateral approach to the brachial plexus for performing infraclavicular block in two groups of patients (n=202). The proximity of the needle to the lung in each group was also measured with and without the arm abducted from the side.
Results. The medial approach was quicker to perform compared with the lateral approach (9 min vs 13 min). The medial approach also had a faster onset. On average, the three cords were more readily imaged with the medial technique (92%) compared with the lateral technique (82%) and the medial technique prevented tourniquet pain more reliably (97%) vs the lateral technique (83%). In the medial technique, the plexus was also closer to the skin (3.7 cm) compared with the lateral technique (4.5 cm). The lateral approach more frequently avoided the chest wall (49%) compared with the medial technique (35%) but resulted in more frequent vascular puncture. Both approaches provided good anesthesia at the surgical site. Abducting the arm 110° and externally rotating the shoulder moves the plexus away from the thorax and closer to the surface of the skin.
Conclusion. For infraclavicular block using ultrasound guidance the medial approach is faster and easier to perform, has lower incidence of tourniquet pain and vascular puncture, and brings the plexus closer to the skin. We recommend abducting the arm 110° to minimize the risk of pneumothorax. Externally rotating the shoulder also brings the plexus closer to the skin.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Macfarlane and K. Anderson Infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks CEACCP, October 1, 2009; 9(5): 139 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Ruiz, X. Sala, X. Bargallo, P. Hurtado, M. J. Arguis, and A. Carrera The Influence of Arm Abduction on the Anatomic Relations of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus: An Ultrasound Study Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2009; 108(1): 364 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Crews, J. C. Gerancher, and R. S. Weller Pneumothorax After Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 275 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Hopkins Ultrasound guidance as a gold standard in regional anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2007; 98(3): 299 - 301. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- The Tourniquet Pain
- SENTHIL K VIJAYAN
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 13 Apr 2006 [Full text]