Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on November 25, 2005
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96(1):67-71; doi:10.1093/bja/aei275
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/1/67    most recent
aei275v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helm, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lampl, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helm, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lampl, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Factors influencing emergency intubation in the pre-hospital setting—a multicentre study in the German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service

M. Helm1,*, B. Hossfeld1, S. Schäfer2, J. Hoitz3 and L. Lampl1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine—HEMS ‘Christoph 22’, Federal Armed Forces Medical Center Ulm, Germany. 2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine—HEMS ‘Christoph 23’, Federal Armed Forces Medical Center Koblenz, Germany. 3 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine—HEMS ‘Christoph 29’, Federal Armed Forces Medical Center Hamburg, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: matthias.helm{at}extern.uni-ulm.de

Background. Definitive airway control by endotracheal intubation (ETI) is standard of care in pre-hospital airway management. However, there are specific factors that may influence and complicate ETI.

Methods. Prospective, descriptive study at three German Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) over a 1-yr period. We examined the success and complication rate for field intubation performed by trauma anaesthetists.

Results. In 342 patients (9.3%) ETI was performed. The overall success rate was 100%; in 87.4% the first attempt was successful, whereas in 11.1% a second and in 1.5% a third ETI attempt was necessary. No patient required a surgical intervention. Limited access to the patient was found upon arrival at the scene in 20.2% of the patients and in 9.6% of the patients at the time of ETI attempt. An orotracheal ETI technique was used in all patients. In the patients in whom only one ETI attempt was necessary for successful intubation, the assessment of ETI conditions was rated ‘very good’ or ‘good’ in 94.7%, but in those requiring a second or third ETI attempt this was reduced to 68.6 and 20.0%, respectively. Difficulties encountered during ETI included blood (19.9%), vomit/debris (15.8%) and secretions (13.8%) in the upper airway; anatomical reasons (11.7%), patient position (9.6%) and surrounding conditions (9.1%), making laryngoscopy more difficult.

Conclusions. Despite various factors increasing the difficulties in managing the airway in the field, definitive airway control by ETI seems to be safe practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
M Gunning, E O'Loughlin, M Fletcher, J Crilly, M Hooper, and D Y Ellis
Emergency intubation: a prospective multicentre descriptive audit in an Australian helicopter emergency medical service
Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2009; 26(1): 65 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Timmermann, S. G. Russo, W. H. Rosenblatt, C. Eich, J. Barwing, M. Roessler, and B. M. Graf
Intubating laryngeal mask airway for difficult out-of-hospital airway management: a prospective evaluation
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2007; 99(2): 286 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. von Goedecke, H. Herff, P. Paal, V. Dorges, and V. Wenzel
Field Airway Management Disasters
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 481 - 483.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
D. Y Ellis, G. E Davies, J. Pearn, and D. Lockey
Prehospital rapid-sequence intubation of patients with trauma with a Glasgow Coma Score of 13 or 14 and the subsequent incidence of intracranial pathology
Emerg. Med. J., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 139 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Scene endotracheal intubation performed by trained physicians is safe and efficient
Philippe G Meyer, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 19 Dec 2005 [Full text]
Prehospital Emergency intubations: Extended role of UK Trauma Anaesthetists.
Sumit Kumar Jha, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 19 Dec 2005 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.