Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on September 23, 2005
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 95(5):685-691; doi:10.1093/bja/aei238
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/5/685    most recent
aei238v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olivier, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hemmerling, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olivier, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hemmerling, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journal.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA

Comparison of three different epidural solutions in off-pump cardiac surgery: pilot study

J. F. Olivier1, N. Le1, J. L. Choinière1, I. Prieto2, F. Basile2 and T. Hemmerling1,*

1 Perioperative Cardiac Research Group, Department of Anesthesiology, and 2 Cardiac Surgery, Hôtel-Dieu, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

* Corresponding author. E-mail: thomashemmerling{at}hotmail.com

Background. Immediate extubation using thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has become more popular after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). In this randomized prospective double-blind study, we present the first comparison of preoperative and postoperative haemodynamics during different regimens of TEA for immediate extubation after cardiac surgery.

Methods. Sixty patients undergoing OPCAB were enrolled in this study. TEA was installed >1 h before application of heparin at levels T2–T4. Analgesia was provided by bupivacaine 0.25%, 8 ml, 15 min before surgery and extubation, and at 10 ml h–1 during surgery and up to 72 h afterwards using one of the following regimens: bupivacaine 0.125% alone, bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 3 µg ml–1 or bupivacaine 0.125% with clonidine 0.6 µg ml–1. Patients were block-randomized for one of the three treatments. Pain scores and infusion rates of TEA were assessed up to 48 h after surgery. Respiratory function was assessed by PaO2 and PaO2 immediately after surgery, and haemodynamic stability was recorded in the form of heart rate and diastolic and systolic blood pressure.

Results. Patient characteristics, respiratory function and haemodynamic stability did not vary between the three groups. Pain control was very good and was not significantly different between the groups using similar infusion rates after surgery. Paraesthesia in dermatomes T1 or C8 occurred equally in all three groups. There was no neurological complication related to TEA in this study.

Conclusions. We conclude that immediate extubation after OPCAB using TEA is feasible with different TEA regimens. Respiratory function, haemodynamic stability and pain control are not different between TEA with bupivacaine alone, bupivacaine with fentanyl or bupivacaine with clonidine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.