Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on February 18, 2005
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 94(5):657-661; doi:10.1093/bja/aei100
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/5/657    most recent
aei100v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gosch, U. W.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gosch, U. W.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journal.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA

Post-dural puncture headache in young adults: comparison of two small-gauge spinal catheters with different needle design

U. W. Gosch1,*, M. Hueppe1, M. Hallschmid2, J. Born2, P. Schmucker1 and T. Meier1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and 2 Department of Neuroendocrinology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: u-gosch{at}foni.net

Background. To reduce the risk of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in continuous spinal anaesthesia, small-gauge spinal catheter systems with different techniques of dural perforation have been developed.

Methods. Two systems, the catheter through-needle technique (MicroCatheter, Portex, UK) and the catheter over-needle technique (22G Spinocath®, B. Braun, Germany), were used in 18 young healthy volunteers (age 18–30 yr), who were enrolled in a neuroendocrinological investigation for analysis of neuropeptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). After intermittent sampling of CSF (17x0.5 ml over 4 h), the catheter was removed and the development of PDPH and pain intensity were documented prospectively by the subjects in a standardized headache assessment (11-point numerical rating scale [NRS]).

Results. The study revealed a high overall incidence of PDPH (78%) with no significant differences between groups (P=0.26). However, the over-needle group showed a significantly shorter duration of PDPH (2.4 [SD 2.3] vs 5.1 [3.1] days, P=0.050) and lower maximum pain intensity (3.1 [2.9] vs 7.3 [3.4] NRS, P=0.014) than the through-needle group.

Conclusions. The results demonstrate a potential benefit of the catheter over-needle technique for the reduction of the duration and intensity of PDPH.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Benrath, S. Kozek-Langenecker, M. Hupfl, P. Lierz, and B. Gustorff
Anaesthesia for brachytherapy--51/2 yr of experience in 1622 procedures
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2006; 96(2): 195 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.