BJA Advance Access originally published online on November 5, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 94(3):330-335; doi:10.1093/bja/aei025
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEUROSCIENCES AND NEUROANAESTHESIA |
Randomized controlled trial of effects of the airflow through the upper respiratory tract of intubated brain-injured patients on brain temperature and selective brain cooling
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, University of Edinburgh, UK. 2 Division of Community Health Sciences (Medical Statistics), University of Edinburgh, UK
* Corresponding author: Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK. E-mail: p.andrews{at}ed.ac.uk
Background. Pyrexia is common after brain injury; it is generally believed to affect outcome adversely and the usual clinical methods of reducing temperature are not effective. The normal physiological mechanisms of brain cooling are heat loss from the upper airways and through the skull, and these can produce selective brain cooling.
Methods. Air at room temperature and humidity was continuously administered to 15 brain-injured, intubated and mechanically ventilated patients via a sponge-tipped oxygen catheter in each nostril at a combined rate of 115 ml kg–1 min–1. Brain temperature was measured using a pressure–temperature Camino catheter which is designed to site the thermistor 1 cm into the parenchyma in the frontal lobe. Oesophageal temperature was measured using an oesophageal stethoscope with a thermistor. After establishing baseline for 30 min, patients were randomized to receive airflow or no airflow for 6 h and then crossed over for a further 6 h.
Results. Airflow replicating normal resting minute volume did not produce clinically relevant or statistically significant reductions in brain temperature [0.13 (SD 0.55)°C; 95% CI, 0.43–0.17°C]. However, we serendipitously found some evidence of selective brain cooling via the skull, but this needs further substantiation.
Conclusions. A flow of humidified air at room temperature through the upper respiratory tracts of intubated brain-injured patients did not produce clinically relevant or statistically significant reductions in brain temperature measured in the frontal lobe.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. K. Maloney, D. Mitchell, G. Mitchell, and A. Fuller Absence of selective brain cooling in unrestrained baboons exposed to heat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): R2059 - R2067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. A. Harris, P. J. D. Andrews, and G. D. Murray Enhanced upper respiratory tract airflow and head fanning reduce brain temperature in brain-injured, mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized, crossover, factorial trial Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2007; 98(1): 93 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|