BJA Advance Access originally published online on October 29, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 94(2):239-242; doi:10.1093/bja/aei015
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004
Minimum effective local anaesthetic dose of isobaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered via a spinal catheter for hip replacement surgery
1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tartu University Clinics, Tartu, Estonia. 2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
* Corresponding author: Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tartu University Clinics, 8 L. Puusepp Street, 51014 Tartu, Estonia. E-mail: andres.sell{at}kliinikum.ee
Background. Continuous spinal anaesthesia with spinal catheters allows incremental dosing of local anaesthetic and, consequently, less haemodynamic changes. However, little is known about the required doses. Therefore, we designed a study to assess the minimum effective local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in this context.
Methods. Forty-one patients undergoing hip replacement surgery were randomly allocated to one of the two local anaesthetic groups in a double-blind manner. The initial dose of local anaesthetic was determined by the response of the previous patient: the effective dose resulted in a 1 mg decrease in the dose of levobupivacaine or ropivacaine, and an ineffective dose resulted in a 1 mg increase. The MLAD was calculated by the Dixon up-and-down method.
Results. The MLAD of levobupivacaine was 11.7 mg (95% CI, 11.112.4) and that of ropivacaine 12.8 mg (95% CI, 12.213.4).
Conclusions. These doses are significantly smaller than doses reported before for single-shot spinal anaesthesia. Continuous spinal anaesthesia allows the use of relatively small doses of local anaesthetic.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Tyagi, A. Kumar, A. K. Sethi, and M. Mohta Epidural Volume Extension and Intrathecal Dose Requirement: Plain Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 333 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Y. Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, H. K. Chang, C. L. So, and T. Gin Spinal Ropivacaine for Lower Limb Surgery: A Dose Response Study Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 520 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Willschke, A. Bosenberg, P. Marhofer, S. Johnston, S. Kettner, U. Eichenberger, O. Wanzel, and S. Kapral Ultrasonographic-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block in pediatric anesthesia: what is the optimal volume? Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1680 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. W. Wildsmith Minimum effective local anaesthetic dose for spinal anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2005; 95(3): 427 - 427. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. O. Columb and H. E. Thomson Confidence with confidence intervals Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2005; 95(1): 111 - 112. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. W. Wildsmith, A. Sell, K. T. Olkkola, J. Jalonen, and R. Aantaa Minimum effective local anaesthetic dose for spinal anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 865 - 866. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- Confidence with confidence intervals
- Malachy O Columb, et al.
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 7 Mar 2005 [Full text]

