BJA Advance Access originally published online on August 20, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004 93(5):655-659; doi:10.1093/bja/aeh248
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004
Intubating laryngeal mask airway allows tracheal intubation when the cervical spine is immobilized by a rigid collar
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. 2 OUTCOMES RESEARCHTM Institute, Lolita and Samuel Weakley Distinguished University Professor of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
* Corresponding author. E-mail: sessler{at}louisville.edu
Background. An intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) facilitates tracheal intubation with the neck in neutral position, which is similar to the neck position maintained by a rigid cervical collar. However, a cervical collar virtually obliterates neck movement, even small movements that normally facilitate airway insertion. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the ILMA will allow tracheal intubation even in patients wearing a rigid cervical collar.
Methods. We performed blind tracheal intubation via an ILMA under general anaesthesia in 50 patients with a rigid Philadelphia collar in place undergoing cervical spine surgery and 50 general surgical patients. Time required for intubation, intubation success rate, and numbers and type of adjusting manoeuvres used were recorded.
Results. Inter-incisor distance was significantly smaller (4.1 (0.8) vs 4.6 (0.7) cm, mean (SD), P<0.01) and Mallampati scores were significantly greater (P<0.001) in the patients with collars. ILMA insertion took longer (30 (25) vs 22 (6) s), more patients required two insertion attempts (15 vs 3; P<0.005), and ventilation adequacy with ILMA was worse (P<0.05) in collared patients. However, there were no significant differences between the collars and control patients in terms of total time required for intubation (60 (41) vs 50 (30) s), number of intubation attempts, overall intubation success rate (96 vs 98%), or the incidence of intubation complications.
Conclusions. Blind intubation through an ILMA is thus a reasonable strategy for controlling the airway in patients who are immobilized with a rigid cervical collar.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Komatsu, K. Kamata, K. Hamada, D. I. Sessler, and M. Ozaki Airway Scope and StyletScope for Tracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2009; 108(1): 273 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Komatsu, K. Kamata, I. Hoshi, D. I. Sessler, and M. Ozaki Airway Scope and gum elastic bougie with Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with simulated restricted neck mobility Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2008; 101(6): 863 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Eschertzhuber, J. Brimacombe, M. Hohlrieder, K.-H. Stadlbauer, and C. Keller Gum Elastic Bougie-Guided Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Is Superior to the Digital and Introducer Tool Techniques in Patients with Simulated Difficult Laryngoscopy Using a Rigid Neck Collar Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1253 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Goutcher and V. Lochhead Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2005; 95(3): 344 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Goutcher, V. Lochhead, R. Komatsu, D. I. Sessler, and M. Ozaki ILMA in cervical spine immobilization Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 544 - 545. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- Use of the intubating laryngeal mask airway in the presence of a rigid cervical collar
- Anita Jhamatt
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 9 Feb 2005 [Full text]