Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on July 26, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004 93(3):422-427; doi:10.1093/bja/aeh217
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/3/422    most recent
aeh217v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matute, E.
Right arrow Articles by López-García, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matute, E.
Right arrow Articles by López-García, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004

Effects of propofol and sevoflurane on the excitability of rat spinal motoneurones and nociceptive reflexes in vitro

E. Matute1,2, I. Rivera-Arconada1 and J. A. López-García1,*

1 Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid 28871 and 2 Departamento de Anestesia, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid 28006, Spain

* Corresponding author. E-mail: josea.lopez{at}uah.es

Background. Spinal actions of halogenated ethers are widely recognized, whereas spinal actions of intravenous anaesthetics like propofol are less clear. The aim of this study was to compare the spinal effects of propofol and sevoflurane.

Methods. We used an isolated spinal cord in vitro preparation from rat pups and superfused the anaesthetics at known concentrations. Responses of motoneurones to single and repetitive C-fibre intensity stimulation (trains of 20 stimuli at 1 Hz) of a lumbar dorsal root were recorded from the corresponding ventral root via a suction electrode.

Results. Stimulation trains produced a wind-up of action potentials in motoneurones. Both propofol and sevoflurane produced a significant concentration-dependent depression of the evoked wind-up, although at clinically relevant concentrations sevoflurane exhibited a larger intrinsic efficacy. Applied at anaesthetic concentrations, sevoflurane 250 µM abolished action potentials whereas propofol 1 µM only produced a reduction close to 50%. At these concentrations, sevoflurane produced a large depressant effect on the monosynaptic reflex whereas propofol was ineffective.

Conclusions. Sevoflurane produces large inhibitory effects on nociceptive and non-nociceptive reflexes which are likely to contribute to immobility during surgery. Compared with sevoflurane, propofol appears to have much weaker effects on spinal reflexes such as those recorded in an isolated preparation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Bennett, L. J. Voss, J. P. M. Barnard, and J. W. Sleigh
Practical Use of the Raw Electroencephalogram Waveform During General Anesthesia: The Art and Science
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 539 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. P. Ng and J. F. Antognini
Isoflurane and Propofol Have Similar Effects on Spinal Neuronal Windup at Concentrations that Block Movement
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1453 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Kakinohana and K. Sugahara
Level of consciousness affects the excitability of spinal motor neurones during propofol sedation in humans
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2006; 96(6): 742 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. H. Baars, S. Tas, K. F. Herold, D. A. Hadzidiakos, and B. Rehberg
The suppression of spinal F-waves by propofol does not predict immobility to painful stimuli in humans{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2006; 96(1): 118 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Garcia-Fernandez, E. Parodi, P. Garcia, E. Matute, I. A-Gomez-de-Segura, R. Cediel, and F. Gilsanz
Clinical actions of subarachnoid sevoflurane administration in vivo: a study in dogs
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2005; 95(4): 530 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.