BJA Advance Access originally published online on July 9, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004 93(3):368-374; doi:10.1093/bja/aeh224
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004
Epidural infusion or combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks as perioperative analgesia for knee arthroplasty
1 Department of Anaesthesia, R D and E Hospital, Exeter, UK. 2 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Plymouth, UK
* Corresponding author. Department of Anaesthesia, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK. E-mail: Anthony.Davies{at}phnt.swest.nhs.uk
Background. Peripheral neural blockade appears to provide effective analgesia with potentially less morbidity than central neuraxial techniques. We compared the relative benefits of combined femoral (3-in-1) and sciatic nerve block with epidural blockade for postoperative knee arthroplasty analgesia.
Methods. Sixty patients, ASA I–III, undergoing unilateral knee replacement were prospectively randomized to receive either a lumbar epidural infusion or combined single-shot femoral (3-in-1) and sciatic blocks (combined blocks). All patients received standard general anaesthesia. Visual analogue pain scores and rescue opioid requirements were recorded at four time points postoperatively. Patient satisfaction, morbidity, block insertion time, perioperative blood loss and rehabilitation indices were also assessed.
Results. In both groups, pain on movement was well controlled at discharge from recovery and 6 h postoperatively but increased at 24 and 48 h. Median (95% CI) analogue scale scores were 0 (0–0), 15 (0–30), 55 (38–75) and 54 (30–67) mm for epidural block and 0.5 (0–22), 21.5 (10–28), 40 (20–50) and 34.5 (21–55) mm for combined block. VAS pain scores with the combined blocks were significantly lower at 24 h (P=0.004). Total morphine usage was low in both groups: median epidural group 17 mg (8–32) versus combined blocks 13 mg (7.8–27.5). Patient satisfaction was high in both groups with median (95% CI) scores of 100 (85–100), 83 (70–100) and 82 (57–90) mm for epidural and 90 (73–100), 100 (77–100) and 97 (80–100) mm for combined blocks (not significant). Perioperative blood loss and rehabilitation indices were also similar.
Conclusions. Combined femoral (3-in-1) and sciatic blocks offer a practical alternative to epidural analgesia for unilateral knee replacements.
Presented in part at the Anaesthetic Research Society Meeting, Glasgow, April 2003.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. A. McLeod, J. Dale, D. Robinson, M. Checketts, M. O. Columb, J. Luck, C. Wigderowitz, and D. Rowley Determination of the EC50 of levobupivacaine for femoral and sciatic perineural infusion after total knee arthroplasty Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2009; 102(4): 528 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Fowler, J. Symons, S. Sabato, and P. S. Myles Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 154 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Zaric, K. Boysen, C. Christiansen, J. Christiansen, S. Stephensen, and B. Christensen A comparison of epidural analgesia with combined continuous femoral-sciatic nerve blocks after total knee replacement. Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2006; 102(4): 1240 - 1246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Kuhne, M. Y. Vanarase, H. G. Pandit, C. A. F. Dodd, D. W. Murray, M. T. Popat, and A. F. Davies Perioperative analgesia for knee arthroplasty Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2005; 94(3): 393 - 395. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|