Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on July 9, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004 93(3):356-361; doi:10.1093/bja/aeh220
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/3/356    most recent
aeh220v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ozyalcin, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Arendt-Nielsen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ozyalcin, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Arendt-Nielsen, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004

Effect of pre-emptive ketamine on sensory changes and postoperative pain after thoracotomy: comparison of epidural and intramuscular routes

N. S. Ozyalcin1, A. Yucel1,4,*, H. Camlica3, N. Dereli2, O. K. Andersen4 and L. Arendt-Nielsen4

1 Department of Algology and 2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Istanbul Medical Faculty and 3 Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Oncology, Capa Klinikleri, Istanbul, 34390 Capa, Istanbul, Turkey. 4 Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Denmark

* Corresponding author. E-mail: yucel{at}istanbul.edu.tr

Background. In this study we have evaluated the efficacy of ketamine via i.m. and epidural routes for the control of post-thoracotomy pain.

Methods. The study was randomized, double blinded and placebo controlled. With the approval of the Faculty Ethics Committee, 60 patients undergoing elective thoracotomy were randomized into three equal groups. Group IM had i.m. ketamine 1 mg kg–1 in 2 ml plus epidural normal saline; Group EPI had epidural ketamine 1 mg kg–1 in 10 ml plus i.m. normal saline; Group C had epidural normal saline 10 ml plus i.m. normal saline 10 ml. Anaesthesia was standardized. Postoperative analgesia was maintained with epidural patient-controlled analgesia using bupivacaine and morphine. Visual analogue scale values and analgesic consumption were evaluated at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. The areas of allodynia, pin-prick hyperalgesia and pressure hyperalgesia were measured at 48 h, and days 15 and 30 in all groups.

Results. Intraoperative fentanyl requirement was significantly lower in Group EPI than Group C. The morphine and bupivacaine requirements were significantly lower in Group EPI than the other two groups in the postoperative period. There was reduced pin-prick hyperalgesia and touch allodynia in the EPI group. There were no side-effects attributable to ketamine.

Conclusion. The results of the present study demonstrate that pre-emptive epidural ketamine is effective in reducing intra- and postoperative analgesic requirements, hyperalgesia and touch allodynia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
V. Minville, O. Fourcade, J.-P. Girolami, and I. Tack
Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in a mice model of orthopaedic pain: preventive effect of ketamine
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2010; 104(2): 231 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K. Wildgaard, J. Ravn, and H. Kehlet
Chronic post-thoracotomy pain: a critical review of pathogenic mechanisms and strategies for prevention
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 36(1): 170 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.