Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on June 11, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004 93(2):181-187; doi:10.1093/bja/aeh201
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/2/181    most recent
aeh201v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Igarashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Igarashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004

Lysis of adhesions and epidural injection of steroid/local anaesthetic during epiduroscopy potentially alleviate low back and leg pain in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis{dagger}

T. Igarashi*, Y. Hirabayashi, N. Seo, K. Saitoh, H. Fukuda and H. Suzuki

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical School, Japan

* Corresponding author: Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical School, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Minamikawachi, Kawachi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan. E-mail: igat{at}jichi.ac.jp

Background. Lumbar spinal stenosis causes various forms of back or leg pain, and is recognized with increasing frequency in elderly patients whose physical status is not always suitable for surgery. Epiduroscopy, a new, minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic technique, may be useful for pain relief in such patients. We investigated the epiduroscopic findings and immediate and long-term changes in back and leg pain after epiduroscopy in elderly patients with spinal stenosis.

Methods. Patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (n=58, median age 71 yr) were divided into two groups based on presenting symptoms: a monosegmental group (n=34) and a multisegmental group (n=24). Each patient underwent epiduroscopy, and the findings were evaluated using visual analogue scales for low back and leg symptoms. Epiduroscopy included breaking down adhesions in the epidural space by injections of saline, and injection of steroids/local anaesthetic.

Results. Epiduroscopy showed that the amount of fatty tissue and the degree of vascularity were greater in the monosegmental group than in the multisegmental group. Relief of low back pain was observed up to 12 months after epiduroscopy in both groups. Relief of leg pain was evident up to 12 months after epiduroscopy in the monosegmental group, and up to 3 months after epiduroscopy in the multisegmental group. None of the patients showed deterioration of motor or sensory deficits during follow-up. One patient was excluded from analysis because of accidental dural puncture during the procedure.

Conclusions. The findings of epiduroscopy corresponded to the symptoms. Epiduroscopy may reduce low back and leg pain in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, particularly those with radiculopathy.

{dagger} This article is accompanied by Editorial I.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
N. Takeshima, H. Miyakawa, K. Okuda, S. Hattori, S. Hagiwara, J. Takatani, and T. Noguchi
Evaluation of the therapeutic results of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis for failed back surgery syndrome
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2009; 102(3): 400 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
K. R. Fai, M. Engleback, J. B. Norman, R. Griffiths, M. Avellanal, and G. Diaz-Reganon
Interlaminar approach for epiduroscopy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2009; 102(2): 280 - 281.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Avellanal and G. Diaz-Reganon
Interlaminar approach for epiduroscopy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 244 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Richardson, J.-W. Kallewaard, G. J. Groen, A. K. Dashfield, and M. B. Taylor
Spinal endoscopy for chronic sciatica
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2005; 95(2): 275 - 276.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
A. K. Dashfield, M. B. Taylor, J. S. Cleaver, and D. Farrow
Comparison of caudal steroid epidural with targeted steroid placement during spinal endoscopy for chronic sciatica: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 514 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
T. P. Nash and T. Igarashi
Epiduroscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2005; 94(2): 250 - 251.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.