BJA Advance Access originally published online on April 2, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 6 859-864
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Clinical Investigations |
Chronopharmacological studies of ketamine in normal and NMDA
1 receptor knockout mice
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan. 2 Division of Organ Replacement Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan. 3 Department of Urology, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan. 4 Department of Molecular Neurobiology and Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
*Corresponding author. E-mail: eijikoba{at}jichi.ac.jp
Background. The effectiveness and toxicity of many drugs depends on the dosing-time schedule, relative to the circadian rhythms of biochemical, physiological, and behavioural processes. Previous studies have found chronopharmacology of ketamine, which is a N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. The in vivo contribution of the NMDA receptor
1 subunit (NR2A) in this effect is unclear.
Methods. In the present study, daily variations in the hypnotic effect of ketamine were determined in wild-type mice and NMDA
1 knockout (KO) mice.
Results. The effect of ketamine had a definite daily variation in wild-type mice. No significant difference in blood concentration was observed at different dosing times (10:00 and 22:00). In NMDA receptor
1 KO mice, the hypnotic effect of ketamine was weaker than in wild-type mice and there was no dependence on the time of administration. Significant pharmacokinetic differences were not observed between wild-type and KO mice.
Conclusions. The enhanced hypnotic effect in the active phase of the circadian cycle is likely a result of changes with the time of day in the susceptibility of the central nervous system to ketamine. Knockout of the NMDA receptor
1 subunit gene markedly reduced the effect of ketamine, and eliminated the time-dependent sensitivity to ketamine.
Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 85964
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. G. Lambert Volume 100: basic sciences in the British Journal of Anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 595 - 596. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sato, T. Onaka, E. Kobayashi, and N. Seo The Differential Effect of Cyclosporine on Hypnotic Response and Pain Reaction in Mice Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1489 - 1493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sato, N. Seo, and E. Kobayashi Ethanol-Induced Hypnotic Tolerance Is Absent in N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor {varepsilon}1 Subunit Knockout Mice. Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 117 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. I. Eger II, M. Liao, M. J. Laster, A. Won, J. Popovich, D. E. Raines, K. Solt, R. C. Dutton, F. V. Cobos II, and J. M. Sonner Contrasting Roles of the N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor in the Production of Immobilization by Conventional and Aromatic Anesthetics. Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1397 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sato, N. Seo, and E. Kobahashi The Dosing-Time Dependent Effects of Intravenous Hypnotics in Mice Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1706 - 1708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Sneyd Recent advances in intravenous anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2004; 93(5): 725 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Durieux Editorial I: Powerful tools require careful handling--the case of the circadian ketamine effect Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2004; 92(6): 783 - 784. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

