BJA Advance Access originally published online on March 19, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 5 689-693
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Rhetoric and reality on acute pain services in the UK: a national postal questionnaire survey
1 Centre for Public Policy and Management, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AL, UK. 2 Tayside Pain Service, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
*Corresponding author. E-mail: aep2{at}st-andrews.ac.uk
Background. The study aimed to explore the extent to which NHS acute pain services (APSs) have been established in accordance with national guidance, and to assess the degree to which clinicians in acute pain management believe that these services are fulfilling their role.
Methods. A postal questionnaire survey addressed to the head of the acute pain service was sent to 403 National Health Service hospitals each carrying out more than 1000 operative procedures a year.
Results. Completed questionnaires were received from 81% (325) of the hospitals, of which 83% (270) had an established acute pain service. Most of these (86%) described their service as Monday–Friday with a reduced service at other times; only 5% described their service as covering 24 hours, 7 days a week. In the majority of hospitals (68%), the on-call anaesthetist was the sole provider of out of hours services. Services were categorized by respondents as thriving (30%), struggling to manage (52%) or non-existent (17%). There was widespread agreement (
85%) on the principles that should underpin acute pain services, and similar agreement on the need for better organizational approaches (95%) rather than new treatments and delivery techniques (19%).
Conclusions. More than a decade since the 1990 report Pain after Surgery, national coverage of comprehensive acute pain services is still far from being achieved. Despite wide consensus about the problems, concrete solutions are proving hard to implement. There is strong support for a two-fold response: securing greater political commitment to pain services and using organizational approaches to address current deficits.
Br J Anaesth 2004: 92: 689–93
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. E. Powell, H. T. O. Davies, J. Bannister, and W. A. Macrae Challenge of improving postoperative pain management: case studies of three acute pain services in the UK National Health Service Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 824 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Powell, H. Davies, J Bannister, and W. Macrae Understanding the challenges of service change - learning from acute pain services in the UK J R Soc Med, February 1, 2009; 102(2): 62 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Macrae Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2008; 101(1): 77 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Brennan, D. B. Carr, and M. Cousins Pain Management: A Fundamental Human Right Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 205 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Power Recent advances in postoperative pain therapy Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2005; 95(1): 43 - 51. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|