Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on March 5, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/5/681    most recent
aeh123v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 5 681-688
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Patient preferences for acute pain treatment{dagger}

T. J. Gan*,1, D. A. Lubarsky2, E. M. Flood3, T. Thanh4, J. Mauskopf5, T. Mayne6 and C. Chen7

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710, USA. 2 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Miami School of Medicine, PO Box 016370, Miami, FL 33101, USA. 3 MEDTAP International, Inc., 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. 4 Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710, USA. 5 RTI Health Solutions, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. 6 Pfizer, Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, 235/4/78, New York, NY 10017, USA. 7 Pharmacia Corporation, 5200 Old Orchard Rd., Tower I, 3rd floor, Skokie, IL 60077, USA

*Corresponding author. E-mail: gan00001{at}mc.duke.edu
{dagger}Declaration of interest. Co-authors Connie Chen, PharmD and Tracy Mayne, PhD are employees of Pharmacia Corporation and Pfizer, Inc. respectively, who funded this project.

Background. Optimal treatment for acute pain is a function of an individual’s willingness to make trade-offs between treatment side effects and pain control. The objective was to investigate the degree to which patients are willing to make these trade-offs.

Methods. Fifty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were enrolled and completed interviews before and after surgery. Measures included an experience with pain questionnaire and an adaptive conjoint analysis (ACA) interview.

Results. Percentage of pain relief obtained post-surgery was between 70 and 80%. Eight-two per cent reported at least one moderate or severe side effect. ACA results demonstrated that pain efficacy and side effect type/severity have almost equal ‘importance’ scores. Patients varied in their willingness to trade-off pain efficacy for different or milder side effects.

Conclusions. We conclude that people have different relative preferences for different side effects and are willing to trade-off pain relief for less upsetting and/or less severe side effects but to different degrees. Thus, physicians should consider offering pain medications with fewer side effects than narcotics as a first choice. Our study indicates the need to balance analgesia and side effects in order for patients to achieve optimal pain control.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 681–8


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. S. Habib, W. D. White, M. A. El Gasim, G. Saleh, T. J. Polascik, J. W. Moul, and T. J. Gan
Transdermal Nicotine for Analgesia After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 999 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. Sun, T. J. Gan, J. W. Dubose, and A. S. Habib
Acupuncture and related techniques for postoperative pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 151 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Carvalho, S. E. Cohen, S. S. Lipman, A. Fuller, A. D. Mathusamy, and A. Macario
Patient Preferences for Anesthesia Outcomes Associated with Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2005; 101(4): 1182 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Lee, T. Gin, A. S. C. Lau, and F. F. Ng
A Comparison of Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Preferences for Symptoms During Immediate Postoperative Recovery and the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 87 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.