Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on March 19, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/5/675    most recent
aeh131v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 5 675-680
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing rofecoxib with dexketoprofen trometamol in surgical dentistry

I. D. Jackson*,1, B. H. Heidemann2, J. Wilson2, I. Power2 and R. D. Brown1

1 Edinburgh Dental Institute, Lauriston Building, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK. 2 University Department Critical Care and Pain Medicine, The Royal Infirmary, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 9SU, UK

*Corresponding author. E-mail: iainandjulia{at}waitrose.com

Background. Rofecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, and dexketoprofen trometamol, a single isomer non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), are available for the treatment of acute pain. Both are claimed to have fewer adverse effects than traditional NSAIDs. We have compared them in a clinical setting.

Methods. We performed a double-blind randomized controlled trial involving 120 patients undergoing surgical removal of a single mandibular third molar at the Edinburgh Dental Institute. Those who developed moderate pain within 4 h of the procedure were allocated to one of three groups: rofecoxib 50 mg (Group RO, n=37); dexketoprofen trometamol 25 mg (Group DE, n=42); or placebo (Group PL, n=41). Participants monitored pain intensity and pain relief for 24 h using visual analogue scales (VAS) and verbal rating scales (VRS). The summed, time-weighted pain relief score to 8 h derived from the VRS (TOTPAR 8) was used as the primary outcome variable.

Results. No significant difference was demonstrated between Groups RO and DE using TOTPAR 8 as the primary outcome variable. Both drugs were significantly different compared with placebo. Rescue analgesia during the trial period was required by only 15 out of 37 subjects in Group RO, but 35 out of 42 subjects in Group DE. The median times to use of rescue medication were 150 (Group PL), 398 (Group DE) and 1440 min (Group RO). Both drugs were well tolerated and adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity.

Conclusions. Rofecoxib and dexketoprofen trometamol are effective treatments for acute pain using a dental pain model and are well tolerated. Rofecoxib has a longer duration of action as a single dose and gave adequate analgesia for over half of that study group; patients in the dexketoprofen trometamol group needed more rescue analgesia.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 675–80


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Kleinert, C. Lange, A. Steup, P. Black, J. Goldberg, and P. Desjardins
Single Dose Analgesic Efficacy of Tapentadol in Postsurgical Dental Pain: The Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 2048 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
M. A. Huber and G. T. Terezhalmy
The use of COX-2 inhibitors for acute dental pain: A second look
J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2006; 137(4): 480 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.