BJA Advance Access originally published online on April 2, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 5 641-650
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Sequential effects of propofol on functional brain activation induced by auditory language processing: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, University of Leipzig, Germany. 2 Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany. 3 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK. 4 Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland
*Corresponding author. E-mail: heiw{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Background. We have investigated the effect of propofol on language processing using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Methods. Twelve healthy male volunteers underwent MRI scanning at a magnetic field strength of 3 Tesla while performing an auditory language processing task. Functional images were acquired from the perisylvian cortical regions that are associated with auditory and language processing. The experiment consisted of three blocks: awake state (block 1), induction of anaesthesia with 3 mg kg1 propofol (block 2), and maintenance of anaesthesia with 3 mg kg1 h1 propofol (block 3). During each block normal sentences and pseudo-word sentences were presented in random order. The subjects were instructed to press a button to indicate whether a sentence was made up of pseudo-words or not. All subjects stopped responding during block two. The data collected before and after the subjects stopped responding during this block were analyzed separately. In addition, propofol plasma concentrations were measured and the effect-site concentrations of propofol were calculated.
Results. During wakefulness, language processing induced brain activation in a widely distributed temporofrontal network. Immediately after unresponsiveness, activation disappeared in frontal areas but persisted in both temporal lobes (block 2 second half, propofol effect-site concentration: 1.51 µg ml1). No activation differences related to the task were observed during block 3 (propofol effect-site concentration: 4.35 µg ml1).
Conclusion. Our findings suggest sequential effects of propofol on auditory language processing networks. Brain activation firstly declines in the frontal lobe before it disappears in the temporal lobe.
Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 64150
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. G. Maandag, D. Coman, B. G. Sanganahalli, P. Herman, A. J. Smith, H. Blumenfeld, R. G. Shulman, and F. Hyder Energetics of neuronal signaling and fMRI activity PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20546 - 20551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Davis, M. R. Coleman, A. R. Absalom, J. M. Rodd, I. S. Johnsrude, B. F. Matta, A. M. Owen, and D. K. Menon Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness PNAS, October 9, 2007; 104(41): 16032 - 16037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
