Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on February 6, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/4/547    most recent
aeh094v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, G. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, G. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 4 547-551
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Laboratory Investigations

Density of spinal anaesthetic solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with and without dextrose

G. A McLeod{dagger}

Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland DD1 9SY, UKE-mail: g.a.mcleod@dundee.ac.uk

{dagger} Declaration of interest. The author has, in the past, received financial help from Chiroscience, Cambridge, UK and Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois for employment of research personnel and he has received honoraria for presentations at medical meetings. The author has also designed and analysed studies in obstetric anaesthesia for Astra Zeneca research fellows.

Background. Spread of intrathecal local anaesthetics is determined principally by baricity and position of the patient. Hypobaric solutions of bupivacaine are characterized by an unpredictable spread of sensory block whereas addition of dextrose 80 mg ml–1 provides a predictable spread but to high thoracic levels. In contrast, dextrose concentrations between 8 and 30 mg ml–1 have shown reliable and consistent spread for surgery. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine the density of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with and without dextrose at both 23 and 37°C before embarking on clinical studies.

Methods. Density (mg ml–1) was measured using the method of mechanical oscillation resonance, accurate to five decimal places on 1250 samples. 500 density measurements were performed in a randomized, blind fashion at 23 and 37°C on 10 plain solutions of bupivacaine (2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg ml–1) levobupivacaine (2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg ml–1) and ropivacaine (2, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg ml–1). Following this, 750 density measurements were taken at 23 and 37°C on the 5 mg ml–1 solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with added dextrose (10, 20, 30, 50, and 80 mg ml–1).

Results. There was a linear relationship between density and dextrose concentration for all three local anaesthetics (R2=0.99) at 23 and 37°C. The mean density of levobupivacaine 5 mg ml–1 was significantly greater than the densities of bupivacaine 5 mg ml–1 and ropivacaine 5 mg ml–1 after adjusting for dextrose concentration using analysis of covariance. This difference existed both at 23 and 37°C. The mean (SD) density of levobupivacaine 7.5 mg ml–1 was 1.00056 (0.00003) mg ml–1, the lower 0.5% percentile (1.00047 mg ml–1) lying above the upper limit of hypobaricity for all patient groups.

Conclusions. The density of local anaesthetics decreases with increasing temperature and increases in a linear fashion with the addition of dextrose. Levobupivacaine 5 mg ml–1 has a significantly higher density compared with bupivacaine 5 mg ml–1 and ropivacaine 5 mg ml–1 at 23 and 37°C both with and without dextrose. Levobupivacaine 7.5 mg ml–1 is an isobaric solution within all patient groups at 37°C.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 547–51


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. Remerand, A. S. Vuitton, M. Palud, S. Buchet, X. Pourrat, A. Baud, M. Laffon, and J. Fusciardi
Elastomeric Pump Reliability in Postoperative Regional Anesthesia: A Survey of 430 Consecutive Devices
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 2079 - 2084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. F. Luck, P. D. W. Fettes, and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery: a comparison of hyperbaric solutions of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2008; 101(5): 705 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Dutta and A. Taneja
Minimum Effective Dose of Bupivacaine Required for Transurethral Procedures Remains Uncertain
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 1170 - 1170.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y.-C. P. Arai, W. Ueda, E. Takimoto, and M. Manabe
The Influence of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Temperature on the Spread of Spinal Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 272 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. A. McLeod and M. O. Columb
Moles, weights and potencies: freedom of expression!
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2005; 95(1): 110 - 111.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Cappelleri, G. Aldegheri, G. Danelli, C. Marchetti, M. Nuzzi, G. Iannandrea, and A. Casati
Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 77 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
P. H. Rosenberg and S. A. Schug
Levobupivacaine base and levobupivacaine hydrochloride
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 544 - 544.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
P. D. W. Fettes, G. Hocking, M. K. Peterson, J. F. Luck, and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Comparison of plain and hyperbaric solutions of ropivacaine for spinal anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 107 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Pitkanen and G. McLeod
Density of spinal anaesthetic solutions
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2004; 93(5): 749 - 749.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.