British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 1 78-88
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Clinical Investigations |
Shortcomings of cuffed paediatric tracheal tubes
1 Department of Anaesthesia and 2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Children’s Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
*Corresponding author. E-mail: markus.weiss@kispi.unizh.ch 
Declaration of interest. The investigated paediatric cuffed tracheal tubes were ordered from local distributors and partially provided without charges. No financial support was obtained for the presented work. Dr Weiss and Dr Gerber are actually involved in designing a new cuffed paediatric tracheal tube in co-operation with Microcuff GmbH, Weinheim, Germany.
Background. The goal of this investigation was to evaluate adequacy of the design of readily available paediatric cuffed tracheal tubes (CPTT).
Methods. In 15 series of cuffed (11) and uncuffed (four) paediatric tracheal tubes (ID: 2.5–7.0 mm) from four different manufacturers the following dimensions were measured: outer diameter of the tube, position and largest diameter of the tube cuff inflated at 20 cm H2O and position of depth markings and compared with age-related dimensions.
Results. Outer diameters for tubes with similar IDs varied markedly between manufacturers and between cuffed and uncuffed tracheal tubes from the same manufacturer. Cuff diameters at 20 cm H2O cuff pressure and cross-sectional cuff area at 20 cm H2O cuff pressure did not always cover maximal internal age-related tracheal diameters and cross-sectional areas. Placing the tube tip in the mid-trachea, the cuffs of cuffed tubes with ID 3.0, 4.0, or 5.0 mm would become positioned within the larynx. If the cuffs were placed 1 cm below the cricoid level, many of the tube tips would be dangerously deep within the trachea. Only five of the 11 cuffed tubes had a depth marking. In many of these tubes the distances from depth marking to tube tip were greater than the age-related minimal tracheal length.
Conclusion. Most cuffed paediatric tracheal tubes are poorly designed, in particular the smaller sizes. A better design of cuffed tubes with a short high-volume, low-pressure cuff, cuff-free subglottic space and adequately placed depth markings are urgently needed.
Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 78–88
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Weiss, A. Dullenkopf, J. E. Fischer, C. Keller, A. C. Gerber, and the European Paediatric Endotracheal Intubation St Prospective randomized controlled multi-centre trial of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in small children Br. J. Anaesth., November 3, 2009; (2009) aep290v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R S Clements, A G Steel, A T Bates, and R Mackenzie Cuffed endotracheal tube use in paediatric prehospital intubation: challenging the doctrine? Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 57 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Weiss, A. Dullenkopf, S. Bottcher, A. Schmitz, K. Stutz, C. Gysin, and A. C. Gerber Clinical evaluation of cuff and tube tip position in a newly designed paediatric preformed oral cuffed tracheal tube Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2006; 97(5): 695 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Behl and J. W. H. Watt Prediction of tracheostomy tube size for paediatric long-term ventilation: an audit of children with spinal cord injury Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 88 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Weiss, A. C. Gerber, and A. Dullenkopf Appropriate placement of intubation depth marks in a new cuffed paediatric tracheal tube Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 80 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|