Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Dahan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Dahan, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 91, No. 6 862-870
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Laboratory Investigations

Comparison of morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine on respiratory depressant and antinociceptive responses in wild type and µ-opioid receptor deficient mice

R. Romberg1, E. Sarton1, L. Teppema1, H. W. D. Matthes2, B. L. Kieffer2 and A. Dahan*,1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. 2 Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicinale/Université Louis Pasteur, BP 163 67404 Illkirch, France

*Corresponding author. E-mail: a.dahan@lumc.nl

Background. Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is a metabolite of morphine with potent analgesic properties. The influence of M6G on respiratory and antinociceptive responses was investigated in mice lacking the µ-opioid receptor (MOR) and compared with morphine.

Methods. Experiments were performed in mice lacking exon 2 of the MOR (n=18) and their wild type (WT) littermates (n=20). The influence of M6G and morphine on respiration was measured using whole body plethysmography during three elevations of inspired carbon dioxide. Antinociception was assessed using tail flick and hotplate tests.

Results. In WT but not null mutant mice, a dose-dependent depression of the slope of the ventilatory carbon dioxide response was observed after M6G and morphine. Similarly, both opioids were devoid of antinociceptive effects in null mutant mice, but showed potent dose-dependent analgesia in WT animals. Potency differences between M6G and morphine in WT mice were of the same order of magnitude for analgesia and respiration.

Conclusions. The data indicate that the desired (antinociceptive) and undesired (respiratory depression) effects of M6G and morphine are linked to the same gene product; that is the MOR. Other opioid- and non-opioid-receptor systems may play a minor role in the actions of M6Gs and morphine. The clinical implications of our findings are that any agent acting at the MOR will invariably cause (potent) analgesia in combination with (variable) respiratory depression.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 862–70


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Koyama, T. Mayahara, T. Wakamatsu, I. Sora, and K. Fukuda
Deletion of {micro}-opioid receptor in mice does not affect the minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anaesthetics and nitrous oxide-induced analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2009; 103(5): 744 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. T. S. Pattinson
Opioids and the control of respiration
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2008; 100(6): 747 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. G. Lambert
Volume 100: basic sciences in the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 595 - 596.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. Yassen, J. Kan, E. Olofsen, E. Suidgeest, A. Dahan, and M. Danhof
Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Respiratory-Depressant Effect of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl in Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 682 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y.-C. Chu, S.-M. Lin, Y.-C. Hsieh, K.-H. Chan, and M.-Y. Tsou
Intraoperative administration of tramadol for postoperative nurse-controlled analgesia resulted in earlier awakening and less sedation than morphine in children after cardiac surgery.
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1668 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. L. A. van Dorp, R. Romberg, E. Sarton, J. G. Bovill, and A. Dahan
Morphine-6-Glucuronide: Morphine's Successor for Postoperative Pain Relief?
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1789 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
A. Dahan
Opioid-induced respiratory effects: new data on buprenorphine
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2006; 20(8_suppl): 3 - 8.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. M. Raehal, J. K. L. Walker, and L. M. Bohn
Morphine Side Effects in {beta}-Arrestin 2 Knockout Mice
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2005; 314(3): 1195 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
J S Mogil, J Ritchie, S B Smith, K Strasburg, L Kaplan, M R Wallace, R R Romberg, H Bijl, E Y Sarton, R B Fillingim, et al.
Melanocortin-1 receptor gene variants affect pain and {micro}-opioid analgesia in mice and humans
J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2005; 42(7): 583 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Dahan, A. Yassen, H. Bijl, R. Romberg, E. Sarton, L. Teppema, E. Olofsen, and M. Danhof
Comparison of the respiratory effects of intravenous buprenorphine and fentanyl in humans and rats
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 825 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.