Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sleigh, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sleigh, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 91, No. 6 810-814
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Implicit memory formation in sedated ICU patients after cardiac surgery

J. Clark, L. Voss*, J. Barnard and J. Sleigh

Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, University of Auckland, Waikato Clinical School, Hamilton, New Zealand

*Corresponding author. E-mail: vossl@waikatodhb.govt.nz

Background. Recent research into memory formation under sedation has generated conflicting results. We investigated explicit and implicit memory in ICU patients during moderate to deep propofol sedation following cardiac surgery.

Methods. Two different methods of memory testing were used; (1) free-association (F-A) word-pair testing (n=33) to test conceptual implicit memory and (2) process dissociation procedure (PDP) (n=26) to detect perceptual implicit and explicit memory. One hour after surgery, whilst sedated, the F-A group received one of two lists of 10 category-exemplar word-pairs through headphones, while the PDP group was presented with one of two lists of 16 five-letter words. When awake and co-operative, the F-A group was tested using F-A testing, and the PDP group was tested using the PDP.

Results. The F-A group had a mean (SD) correct response rate of 7 (9)% for the target list, and 9 (8)% for the distractor list. The PDP group had a mean (SD) correct response rate of 11 (14) and 10 (13)% for the inclusion and exclusion lists, respectively, with mean correct response rates of 13 (14)% for both the corresponding distractor lists. Neither group showed any significant differences between their responses and a list of distractor words (Wilcoxon tests).

Conclusion. We found no evidence for memory formation in post-cardiac surgery patients under moderate to deep propofol sedation.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 810–14


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.