Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pueyo, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Carrascosa, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pueyo, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Carrascosa, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 91, No. 4 589-592
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Short Communications

Cost-effectiveness of three combinations of antiemetics in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

F. J. Pueyo1, L. López-Olaondo*,1, M. J. Sanchez-Ledesma1, A. Ortega2 and F. Carrascosa1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care and 2 Department of Pharmacology, University Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Avda. Pio XII 36, E-31007, Pamplona, Spain

Corresponding author. E-mail: llolaond@unav.es

Background. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of three combinations of antiemetics in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Methods. We conducted a prospective, double-blind study. Ninety ASA I–II females, 18–65 yr, undergoing general anaesthesia for major gynaecological surgery, with standardized postoperative analgesia (intrathecal 0.2 mg plus i.v. PCA morphine), were randomly assigned to receive: ondansetron 4 mg plus droperidol 1.25 mg after induction and droperidol 1.25 mg 12 h later (Group 1); dexamethasone 8 mg plus droperidol 1.25 mg after induction and droperidol 1.25 mg 12 h later (Group 2); ondansetron 4 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg after induction and placebo 12 h later (Group 3). A decision analysis tree was used to divide each group into nine mutually exclusive subgroups, depending on the incidence of PONV, need for rescue therapy, side effects and their treatment. Direct cost and probabilities were calculated for each subgroup, then a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the hospital point of view.

Results. Groups 1 and 3 were more effective (80 and 70%) than Group 2 (40%, P=0.004) in preventing PONV but also more expensive. Compared with Group 2, the incremental cost per extra patient without PONV was €6.99 (95% CI, –1.26 to 36.57) for Group 1 and €13.55 (95% CI, 0.89–132.90) for Group 3.

Conclusion. Ondansetron+droperidol is cheaper and at least as effective as ondansetron+ dexamethasone, and it is more effective than dexamethasone+droperidol with a reasonable extra cost.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 589–92


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C.-C. Chu, J.-P. Shieh, J.-I. Tzeng, J.-Y. Chen, Y. Lee, S.-T. Ho, and J.-J. Wang
The Prophylactic Effect of Haloperidol Plus Dexamethasone on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1402 - 1406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. M. Richman, S. S. Liu, G. Courpas, R. Wong, A. J. Rowlingson, J. McGready, S. R. Cohen, and C. L. Wu
Does Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Provide Superior Pain Control to Opioids? A Meta-Analysis
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 248 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.