British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 91, No. 3 319-328
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Clinical Investigations |
Expertise in practice: an ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anaesthesia
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster LA1 4RP, UK. 2 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK. 3 Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YT, UK
Corresponding author. E-mail: andrew.smith@rli.mbht.nhs.uk
Background. Expert professional practice in any field is known to rely on both explicit (formal) and tacit (personal) forms of knowledge. Current anaesthetic training programmes appear to favour explicit knowledge and measurable competencies. We aimed to describe and explore the way different types of knowledge are learned and used in anaesthetic practice.
Method. Qualitative approach using non-participant observation of, and semi-structured interviews with, anaesthetic staff in two English hospitals.
Results. The development of expertise in anaesthesia rests on the ability to reconcile and interpret many sources of knowledge—clinical, social, electronic, and experiential—and formal theoretical learning. Experts have mastered technical skills but are also able to understand the dynamic and uncertain condition of the anaesthetized patient and respond to changes in it. This expertise is acquired by working with colleagues, and, importantly, by working independently, to develop personal routines. Routines mark the successful incorporation of new knowledge but also function as a defence against the inherent uncertainty of anaesthetic practice. The habits seen in experts’ routines are preferred ways of working chosen from a larger repertoire of techniques which can also be mobilized as changing circumstances demand.
Conclusions. Opportunities for developing expertise are linked to the independent development of personal routines. Evidence-based approaches to professional practice may obscure the role played by the interpretation of knowledge. We suggest that the restriction of apprenticeship-style training threatens the acquisition of anaesthetic expertise as defined in this paper.
Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 319–28
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Mort and A. Smith Beyond Information: Intimate Relations in Sociotechnical Practice Sociology, April 1, 2009; 43(2): 215 - 231. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. F. Smith, C. Pope, D. Goodwin, and M. Mort Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia: observational study of handovers in the recovery room Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2008; 101(3): 332 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Phipps, G. H. Meakin, P. C. W. Beatty, C. Nsoedo, and D. Parker Human factors in anaesthetic practice: insights from a task analysis Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2008; 100(3): 333 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F. Smith Reaching the parts that are hard to reach: expanding the scope of professional education in anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 453 - 456. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F. Smith, C. Pope, D. Goodwin, and M. Mort What defines expertise in regional anaesthesia? An observational analysis of practice Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2006; 97(3): 401 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F. Smith, D. Goodwin, M. Mort, and C. Pope Adverse events in anaesthetic practice: qualitative study of definition, discussion and reporting. Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2006; 96(6): 715 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Leedal and A. F. Smith Methodological approaches to anaesthetists' workload in the operating theatre Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 702 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A F Smith, C Wild, and J Law The Barrow-in-Furness legionnaires' outbreak: qualitative study of the hospital response and the role of the major incident plan Emerg. Med. J., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 251 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F. Smith, M. Kane, and R. Milne Comparative effectiveness and safety of physician and nurse anaesthetists: a narrative systematic review Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 540 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.F. Smith, D.S. Goodwin, M. Mort, C. Pope, J. Larsson, I. Holmstrom, E. Lindberg, and U. Rosenqvist Anaesthetists understand their work in different ways Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2004; 93(2): 303 - 304. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|