British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 90, No. 5 689-691
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Short Communications |
Warming by resistive heating maintains perioperative normothermia as well as forced air heating
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Saiseikai Shimonoseki General Hospital, Shimonoseki, Japan. 2 Department of Anaesthesia, University of Yamanashi, Faculty of Medicine, Tamaho, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
None of the authors has personal financial interests related to this study.
Background. Even mild perioperative hypothermia is associated with several severe adverse effects. Resistive heating has possible advantages compared with other active warming systems because it can heat several fields independently. To assess this new warming system, we measured core temperature in patients during surgery who were warmed with circulating water mattresses, forced air covers or resistive heating covers.
Methods. Twenty-four patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to (i) circulating water mattress (38°C), (ii) forced air warming (set to medium) or (iii) carbon-fibre resistive warming (38°C). Warming was applied throughout anaesthesia and surgery. The groups were compared using one-way ANOVA and StudentNewmanKeuls tests.
Results. Confounding factors were similar among the groups. Core temperatures in each group decreased for 20 min, but subsequently increased in the forced air and resistive heating groups. There was no significant difference between the forced air and resistive heating groups at any time. In contrast, core temperature in the circulating water group continued to decrease. Consequently, core temperature in the circulating water group was significantly lower than in the other groups 30 min after anaesthetic induction and at later times.
Conclusions. Resistive heating maintains core body temperature as well as forced air heating and both are better than circulating water. Resistive heating offers the advantage of adjustable heating pods.
Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 68991
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Kimberger, C. Held, K. Stadelmann, N. Mayer, C. Hunkeler, D. I. Sessler, and A. Kurz Resistive Polymer Versus Forced-Air Warming: Comparable Heat Transfer and Core Rewarming Rates in Volunteers Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1621 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.K. Hofer, M. Worn, R. Tavakoli, L. Sander, M. Maloigne, R. Klaghofer, and A. Zollinger Influence of body core temperature on blood loss and transfusion requirements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A comparison of 3 warming systems J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2005; 129(4): 838 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Brauer, L. Pacholik, T. Perl, M. J. M. English, W. Weyland, and U. Braun Conductive Heat Exchange with a Gel-Coated Circulating Water Mattress Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1742 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Brauer, T. Perl, Z. Uyanik, M. J. M. English, W. Weyland, and U. Braun Perioperative thermal insulation: minimal clinically important differences? Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2004; 92(6): 836 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


