Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nitahara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Higa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nitahara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Higa, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 90, No. 4 507-509
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Short Communications

Effect of continuous low-dose intravenous diltiazem on epidural fentanyl analgesia after lower abdominal surgery

K. Nitahara1, M. Matsunaga1, K. Katori1, H. Yotsui1, H. Higuchi1,2 and K. Higa1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan. 2 Department of Anesthesiology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan

Corresponding author. E-mail: nitahara@fukuoka-u.ac.jp

Background. The postoperative opioid-sparing effects of systemic L-type calcium channel blockers are controversial. We investigated whether the postoperative analgesic effect of epidural fentanyl was enhanced by i.v. infusion of diltiazem at a rate that would minimize any cardiovascular depressant effect.

Methods. After elective lower abdominal gynaecological surgery, 30 patients were randomized to receive continuous i.v. diltiazem 1 µg kg–1 min–1 (diltiazem group) or the same volume of saline (control group) for 24 h. Cumulative postoperative epidural fentanyl consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and verbal rating scores (VRS) at rest and during mobilization, sedation scores, incidence of side-effects and overall patient satisfaction were assessed.

Results. There was no significant difference in cumulative epidural fentanyl consumption between the groups at any period. Although there were no statistically significant differences in VAS scores, VRS, sedation scores, incidence of side-effects and overall patient satisfaction, there was a trend to an increased incidence of nausea in the diltiazem group.

Conclusions. Continuous i.v. infusion of diltiazem did not reduce epidural fentanyl consumption when administered at dosages having minimal haemodynamic depressant effects.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 507–9


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.