Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eichenberger, U.
Right arrow Articles by Curatolo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eichenberger, U.
Right arrow Articles by Curatolo, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 90, No. 4 467-473
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Lumbar epidural fentanyl: segmental spread and effect on temporal summation and muscle pain

U. Eichenberger1, C. Giani1, S. Petersen-Felix1, T. Graven-Nielsen2, L. Arendt-Nielsen2 and M. Curatolo1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Pain Therapy, University of Bern, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland. 2 Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark

Corresponding author. E-mail: urs.eichenberger@insel.ch

Background. Despite extensive use, different aspects of the pharmacological action of epidural fentanyl have not been clarified. We applied a multi-modal sensory test procedure to investigate the effect of epidural fentanyl on segmental spread, temporal summation (as a measure for short-lasting central hyperexcitability) and muscle pain.

Methods. Thirty patients received either placebo, 50 or 100 µg single dose of fentanyl epidurally (L2–3), in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Heat pain tolerance thresholds at eight dermatomes from S1 to fifth cranial nerve (assessment of segmental spread), pain threshold to transcutaneous repeated electrical stimulation of the sural nerve (assessment of temporal summation) and pain intensity after injection of hypertonic saline into the tibialis anterior muscle (assessment of muscle pain) were recorded.

Results. Fentanyl 100 µg, but not 50 µg, produced analgesia to heat stimulation only at L2. Surprisingly, no effect at S1 was detected. Both fentanyl doses significantly increased temporal summation threshold and decreased muscle pain intensity.

Conclusions. The findings suggest that a single lumbar epidural dose of fentanyl should be injected at the spinal interspace corresponding to the dermatomal site of pain. Increased effect on L2 compared with S1 suggests that drug effect on spinal nerve roots and binding to opioid receptors on the dorsal root ganglia may be more important than traditionally believed for the segmental effect of epidurally injected fentanyl. Epidural fentanyl increases temporal summation threshold and could therefore contribute to prevention and treatment of central hypersensitivity states. I.M. injection of hypertonic saline is a sensitive technique for detecting the analgesic action of epidural opioids.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 467–73


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
M. Curatolo, S. Petersen-Felix, and L. Arendt-Nielsen
Assessment of regional analgesia in clinical practice and research
Br. Med. Bull., January 31, 2005; 71(1): 61 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.