Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keïta, H.
Right arrow Articles by Desmonts, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keïta, H.
Right arrow Articles by Desmonts, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 90, No. 1 53-57
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Comparison between patient-controlled analgesia and subcutaneous morphine in elderly patients after total hip replacement

H. Keïta*, N. Geachan, S. Dahmani, E. Couderc, C. Armand, M. Quazza, J. Mantz and J. M. Desmonts

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital Bichat, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, F-75018 Paris, France*Corresponding author. E-mail: hawakeita@club-internet.fr

{dagger}Supported in part by a research grant from Fondation de l’Avenir pour la Recherche Médicale Appliquée. Some of this work was presented, at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Dallas, TX, USA October 9–13, 1999.

Background. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness on postoperative pain, and cognitive impact, of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) compared with subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine in elderly patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR).

Methods. Forty patients older than 70 yr were randomly assigned to two different postoperative analgesic techniques for 48 h: i.v. PCA morphine (dose, 1 mg; lockout interval, 8 min; PCA group) or regular s.c. morphine injections (SC group). Postoperative pain was assessed at rest and when moving, using a visual analogue scale (VAS) every 4 h. A Mini Mental Status (MMS) examination was used to assess cognitive functions before surgery, at 2 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery, and at hospital discharge. Side-effects were also recorded systematically during the first 48 h after surgery.

Results. The PCA group showed significantly lower pain scores than the SC group both at rest and during mobilization. However, the clinical significance of pain scores was weak. There was no intergroup difference in postoperative MMS scores. The incidence of side-effects was similar in both groups.

Conclusions. We conclude that in healthy elderly subjects undergoing THR, the flexibility of the analgesic regimen is more important than the route of administration with regard to efficacy, adverse effects and recovery of cognitive function.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 53–7


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C. Fonzo-Christe, C. Vukasovic, A.-F. Wasilewski-Rasca, and P. Bonnabry
Subcutaneous administration of drugs in the elderly: survey of practice and systematic literature review
Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2005; 19(3): 208 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. L. Apfelbaum, T. J. Gan, S. Zhao, D. B. Hanna, and C. Chen
Reliability and Validity of the Perioperative Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2004; 99(3): 699 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.