Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gould, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gould, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 89, No. 3 446-451
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Clinical Investigations

Effect of thoracic epidural anaesthesia on colonic blood flow

T. H. Gould*,1, K. Grace2, G. Thorne3 and M. Thomas2

1 Sir Humphrey Davy Department of Anaesthesia, 2 University Department of Surgery and 3 University Department of Medical Physics, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Marlborough Street, Bristol BS8 2HW, UK*Corresponding author

Background. The effect of thoracic epidural block on splanchnic blood flow is unclear. It remains to be resolved if sympathetic block, increases or decreases regional splanchnic blood flow and whether regional splanchnic flow becomes dependent on cardiac output or perfusion pressure. A clear understanding of the regional haemodynamic consequences of an epidural block may modify practice with respect to epidural anaesthesia.

Methods. Fifteen patients, who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer, had invasive intraoperative monitoring of arterial pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output, inferior mesenteric artery flow (Doppler flow probe), and colonic serosal red cell flux (laser Doppler probe), while an epidural block was established with local anaesthetic. In three consecutive time periods, arterial pressure was first allowed to fall (to a mean arterial pressure of 60 mm Hg), then treated with colloid fluid resuscitation and finally by vasopressors until the pre- epidural arterial pressure had been restored.

Results. On induction of epidural block, there was a reduction in mean colonic serosal red cell flux to 65% and inferior mesenteric artery flow to 80% (mean) of pre-epidural levels. There was a strong association between mean arterial pressure and both measured inferior mesenteric artery blood flow (P<0.004) and colonic serosal red cell flux (P<0.0001). Changes in cardiac output were poorly associated with either inferior mesenteric artery blood flow (P=0.638) or colonic serosal red cell flux (P=0.265). Inferior mesenteric artery blood flow and colonic serosal red cell flux were restored to pre-epidural levels after arterial pressure had been improved with a vasopressor.

Conclusion. Once intraoperative epidural block has been established, colonic serosal red cell flux and inferior mesenteric artery flow are more closely associated with changes in mean arterial pressure than changes in cardiac output. The measured reduction in colonic flow does not respond to an increase in cardiac output with fluid resuscitation, but requires the use of a vasopressor to increase arterial pressure, before colonic blood flow is improved.

Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 446–51


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Meierhenrich, F. Wagner, W. Schutz, M. Rockemann, P. Steffen, U. Senftleben, and A. Gauss
The Effects of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia on Hepatic Blood Flow in Patients Under General Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2009; 108(4): 1331 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
G. A. McLeod, K. Dell, C. Smith, and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Measuring the quality of continuous epidural block for abdominal surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2006; 96(5): 633 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
G. Djaiani, L. Fedorko, and W. S. Beattie
Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Friend or A Foe?
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 87 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. D. Page, M. J. Shackcloth, G. N. Russell, and S. H. Pennefather
Surgical treatment of anastomotic leaks after oesophagectomy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 337 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care PainHome page
Feedback
CEACCP, August 1, 2004; 4(4): 132 - 133.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
S. J. Howell, J. W. Sear, and P. Foex
Hypertension, hypertensive heart disease and perioperative cardiac risk{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2004; 92(4): 570 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care PainHome page
G. McLeod and C Cumming
Thoracic epidural anaesthesia and analgesia
CEACCP, February 1, 2004; 4(1): 16 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.