Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeffs, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeffs, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 89, No. 3 424-427
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Clinical Investigations

Comparison of morphine alone with morphine plus clonidine for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia

S. A. Jeffs*,1, J. E. Hall1 and S. Morris2

1 University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK. 2 Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Llandough Hospital, Penlan Road, Llandough, Penarth, South Glamorgan, UK *Corresponding author

Background. Clonidine is an {alpha}2 adrenergic agonist with analgesic properties. This study aimed to see if the addition of clonidine to morphine when given by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) would improve analgesia beyond the first 12 h after surgery.

Methods. Sixty patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery were recruited into a randomized double blind study. At the end of surgery Group C received an infusion of clonidine 4 µg kg–1 over 20 min, PCA clonidine 20 µg and morphine 1 mg bolus. Group M received an infusion of saline and then PCA morphine 1 mg bolus. Pain, sedation and nausea and vomiting were assessed after 12, 24 and 36 h, and satisfaction with analgesia was assessed at 36 h.

Results. Pain scores were significantly lower in Group C between 0 and 12 h, but thereafter there was no difference. Morphine consumption was the same for both groups until 24–36 h. Nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced in Group C between 0 and 24 h. Patients in Group C were significantly happier with their pain relief (four-point scale).

Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 424–7


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. D. Farmery and J. Wilson-MacDonald
The Analgesic Effect of Epidural Clonidine After Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2009; 108(2): 631 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
Y.-C. Yeh, T.-F. Lin, F.-S. Lin, Y.-P. Wang, C.-J. Lin, and W.-Z. Sun
Combination of opioid agonist and agonist-antagonist: patient-controlled analgesia requirement and adverse events among different-ratio morphine and nalbuphine admixtures for postoperative pain
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2008; 101(4): 542 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White
The Changing Role of Non-Opioid Analgesic Techniques in the Management of Postoperative Pain
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S5 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. A. Grass
Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S44 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Carey, S. Jagger, S. A. Jeffs, J. E. Hall, and S. Morris
Comparison of morphine alone with morphine plus clonidine for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 253 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.