Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muñoz, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cortínez, L. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muñoz, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cortínez, L. I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 88, No. 6 814-818
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Clinical Investigations

Effect of timing of morphine administration during remifentanil-based anaesthesia on early recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative pain

H. R. Muñoz*, M. E. Guerrero, V. Brandes and L. I. Cortínez

Department of Anaesthetics, PO Box 114-D, Catholic University School of Medicine, Marcoleta 367, Santiago, Chile *Corresponding author

Background. Since the time to peak analgesic effect of intravenous morphine can be longer than 40–60 min in volunteers, the goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of the timing of intraoperative morphine administration on early postoperative pain.

Methods. A total of 120 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with remifentanil and etomidate and maintained with remifentanil and sevoflurane/nitrous oxide. Morphine 150 µg kg–1 was given randomly at three different times during surgery, and a fourth group received placebo. Times to eyes opening and extubation were measured, and pain was evaluated in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Morphine 2–3 mg was given when the VAS score was >=50 mm. The four groups were, according to the time elapsed from morphine administration to the end of surgery, group 1 (n=30): placebo; group 2 (n=33): <20 min; group 3 (n=30): 20–40 min; group 4 (n=27): >40 min.

Results. Recovery from anaesthesia and pain scores were similar in all groups. However, mean (SD) morphine consumption was 5.7 (4.7) mg in group 1, 4.4 (4.2) mg in group 2, 4.7 (4.7) mg in group 3, and 2.2 (4.0) mg in group 4 (P<0.05, group 1 vs 4). Morphine was required in only 38% of patients in group 4 compared with 83%, 67% and 69% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P<0.01, group 1 vs 4).

Conclusions. The timing of intraoperative morphine administration did not affect the early recovery from anaesthesia. However, the reduction in the number of patients requiring morphine in the PACU when morphine had been given more than 40 min before the end of surgery supports this practice, rather than administration closer to the end of surgery.

Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 814–8


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. R. Sneyd
Recent advances in intravenous anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2004; 93(5): 725 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.