Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allaouchiche, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chassard, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allaouchiche, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chassard, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 88, No. 3 369-373
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Clinical Investigations

Noise in the postanaesthesia care unit

B. Allaouchiche, F. Duflo, R. Debon, A. Bergeret and D. Chassard*

Service d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital de l’Hôtel-Dieu, F-69002 Lyon, France *Corresponding author

Background. Although the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) can be noisy, the effect of noise on patients recovering from anaesthesia is unknown. We studied the sources and intensity of noise in the PACU and assessed its effect on patients’ comfort.

Methods. We measured noise in a five-bed PACU with a sound level meter. Noise levels were obtained using an A-weighted setting (dBA) and peak sound using a linear scale (dBL). Leq (average noise level at 5-s intervals), maximun Leq (LeqMax), minimum Leq (LeqMin) and noise peaks (Lpc) were calculated. During recording, an independent observer noted the origin of sounds from alarms and noise above 65 dB intensity (P65dB). Two hours after leaving the PACU, patients were asked about their experience and to rank their complaints on a visual analogue scale (VAS) using unstructured and structured questionnaires.

Results. We made 20 187 measurements over 1678 min. The mean Leq, LeqMax and LeqMin were 67.1 (SD 5.0), 75.7 (4.8) and 48.6 (4.1) dBA respectively. The mean Lpc was 126.2 (4.3) dBL. Five per cent of the noise was at a level above 65 dBA. Staff conversation caused 56% of sounds greater than 65 dB and other noise sources (alarm, telephone, nursing care) were each less than 10% of these sounds. Five patients reported disturbance from noise. There was no significant difference in Leq measured for patients who found the PACU noisy and those who did not [59.5 (3.1) and 59.4 (2.4) dBA respectively]. Stepwise multiple logistic regression indicated that only pain was associated with discomfort.

Conclusions. Even though sound in the PACU exceeded the internationally recommended intensity (40 dBA), it did not cause discomfort. Conversation was the most common cause of excess noise.

Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 369–73


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
M. Rashid and C. Zimring
A Review of the Empirical Literature on the Relationships Between Indoor Environment and Stress in Health Care and Office Settings: Problems and Prospects of Sharing Evidence
Environment and Behavior, March 1, 2008; 40(2): 151 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.