Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suttner, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suttner, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 87, No. 5 699-705
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Cerebral effects and blood sparing efficiency of sodium nitroprusside-induced hypotension alone and in combination with acute normovolaemic haemodilution

S. W. Suttner*, S. N. Piper, K. Lang, I. Hüttner, B. Kumle and J. Boldt

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Mainz, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany*Corresponding author

The combined reduction of oxygen-carrying capacity and perfusion pressure during the combination of acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) and controlled hypotension (CH) raises concerns of hypoperfusion and ischaemic injury to the brain. Forty-two patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were prospectively allocated to receive CH induced by sodium nitroprusside (mean arterial pressure (MAP) 50 mm Hg), a combination of CH+ANH (post-ANH haematocrit 29%; intraoperative MAP 50 mm Hg), or standard anaesthesia (control). Serum levels of the brain-originated proteins neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and protein S-100, blood loss, transfusion requirements, adverse effects, and postoperative recovery profile were compared among the three groups. Intraoperative blood loss in the CH group (mean (SD)) (788 (193) ml) and CH+ANH group (861 (184) ml) was significantly less than in the control group (1335 (460) ml). Significantly fewer total units of allogeneic packed red blood cells (PRBC) were transfused in the patients receiving hypotensive anaesthesia (CH, 3 units; CH+ANH, 2 units; control, 17 units). There was no difference in immediate postoperative recovery profile among the three groups as determined by the emergence from anaesthesia and time to discharge from the postanaesthesia care unit. Serum S-100 protein concentrations increased significantly in all groups from baseline to peak concentrations 2 h postoperatively (CH 0.25 (0.11) µg litre–1; CH+ANH 0.31 (0.12) µg litre–1; control 0.31 (0.10) µg litre–1). A return to baseline values was seen within 24 h postoperatively in all patients. No changes in NSE concentrations were seen. Our observations suggest that CH and CH+ANH were effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Increased serum S-100 protein concentrations imply a disturbance in astroglial cell membrane integrity and an increased endothelial permeability of the blood–brain barrier. There were no associations between serum S-100 protein or NSE and adverse cognitive effects. Further work needs to be done to determine the prognostic importance of S-100 protein and NSE as surrogate variables of postoperative cerebral complications.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 699–705


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.