Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanloeil, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nougarède, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blanloeil, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nougarède, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 87, No. 4 635-638
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Short Communications

Postoperative analgesia by epidural methylprednisolone after posterolateral thoracotomy

Y. Blanloeil*, P. Bizouarn, Y. Le Teurnier, C. Le Roux, J.C. Rigal, E. Sellier and B. Nougarède

Service d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital G et R Laënnec, Boulevard J Monod, CHU Nantes, F-44093 Nantes Cedex 01, France*Corresponding author

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential analgesic effect of epidural methylprednisolone (MP) after posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT). Adult male patients undergoing PLT for lung surgery were included in a prospective, randomized, double blind study. Peroperative analgesia (bupivacaine plus sufentanil) was given by a thoracic epidural catheter associated with general anaesthesia. After surgery, patients received either MP 1 mg kg–1 followed by a continuous epidural infusion of MP 1.5 mg kg–1 during 48 h (MP group) or 0.9% saline as a bolus injection and continuous epidural infusion (P group). Additional morphine analgesia was administered by i.v. patient-controlled analgesia. Pain was assessed at rest and with mobilization every 4 h after operation during 48 h with a visual analogue scale (VAS). The primary end-point was the total morphine requirements during the 48 first postoperative hour. Twenty-four patients were allocated to MP (n=12) and P (n=12) groups. Characteristics of the two groups were similar. There were no differences between groups for morphine requirements (median and interquartile range) during the 48 h: 59 mg (40–78) in MP group vs 65 mg (59–93) in P group. There were no differences between groups for morphine requirements every 4 h during the 48 h and VAS for pain at rest and evoked pain. No side effects were reported. It was concluded in this small study that these results did not support the use of epidural steroids for postoperative analgesia after PLT.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 635–8


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
Methods of post-thoracotomy analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2002; 89(1): 184 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.