Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouwmeester, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tibboel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bouwmeester, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tibboel, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 87, No. 3 390-399
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Hormonal and metabolic stress responses after major surgery in children aged 0–3 years: a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the effects of continuous versus intermittent morphine{dagger}

N. J. Bouwmeester*,1,2, K. J. S. Anand3, M. van Dijk4, W. C. J. Hop5, F. Boomsma6 and D. Tibboel2

1Department of Anaesthesiology and 2Paediatric Surgery, Sophia Children’s Hospital, University Hospital Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 60, 3015 GJ Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3Department of Paediatrics, Critical Care Medicine Section, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. 4Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 6Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands*Corresponding author

{dagger} Presented in part at the 2000 APA meeting, Birmingham, UK.

Children aged 0–3 yr were stratified for age and randomized to receive either continuous morphine (CM, 10 µg kg–1 h–1) with three-hourly placebo boluses or intermittent morphine (IM, 30 µg kg–1 every 3 h) with a placebo infusion for postoperative analgesia. Plasma concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, insulin, glucose and lactate were measured before and at the end of surgery and 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery. Pain was assessed with validated pain scales [the COMFORT scale and a visual analogue scale (VAS)] with the availability of additional morphine doses. Minor differences occurred between the randomized treatment groups, the oldest IM group (aged 1–3 yr) having a higher blood glucose concentration (P=0.003), mean arterial pressure (P=0.02) and COMFORT score (P=0.02) than the CM group. In the neonates, preoperative plasma concentrations of norepinephrine (P=0.01) and lactate (P<0.001) were significantly higher, while the postoperative plasma concentrations of epinephrine were significantly lower (P<0.001) and plasma concentrations of insulin significantly higher (P<0.005) than in the older age groups. Postoperative pain scores (P<0.003) and morphine consumption (P<0.001) were significantly lower in the neonates than in the older age groups. Our results show that continuous infusion of morphine does not provide any major advantages over intermittent morphine boluses for postoperative analgesia in neonates and infants.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 390–9


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
J. L. Owens and N. Musa
Nutrition Support After Neonatal Cardiac Surgery
Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2009; 24(2): 242 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. J. S. Anand, B. J. Anderson, N. H. G. Holford, R. W. Hall, T. Young, B. Shephard, N. S. Desai, B. A. Barton, and for the NEOPAIN Trial Investigators Group
Morphine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in preterm and term neonates: secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2008; 101(5): 680 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
L. L. Cohen, K. Lemanek, R. L. Blount, L. M. Dahlquist, C. S. Lim, T. M. Palermo, K. D. McKenna, and K. E. Weiss
Evidence-based Assessment of Pediatric Pain
J. Pediatr. Psychol., October 1, 2008; 33(9): 939 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. C. Gjerstad, K. Wagner, T. Henrichsen, and H. Storm
Skin Conductance Versus the Modified COMFORT Sedation Score as a Measure of Discomfort in Artificially Ventilated Children
Pediatrics, October 1, 2008; 122(4): e848 - e853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
G. B. Hammer and B. Golianu
Opioid analgesia in neonates following cardiac surgery.
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2007; 11(1): 47 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. D. van der Marel, J. W. B. Peters, N. J. Bouwmeester, E. Jacqz-Aigrain, J. N. van den Anker, and D. Tibboel
Rectal acetaminophen does not reduce morphine consumption after major surgery in young infants
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2007; 98(3): 372 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Surg, Canadian Paediatric Society, and Fetus and Newborn Committee
Prevention and Management of Pain in the Neonate: An Update
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 2231 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Carbajal, R. Lenclen, M. Jugie, A. Paupe, B. A. Barton, and K. J. S. Anand
Morphine Does Not Provide Adequate Analgesia for Acute Procedural Pain Among Preterm Neonates
Pediatrics, June 1, 2005; 115(6): 1494 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
S H P Simons, M van Dijk, R A van Lingen, D Roofthooft, F Boomsma, J N van den Anker, and D Tibboel
Randomised controlled trial evaluating effects of morphine on plasma adrenaline/noradrenaline concentrations in newborns
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2005; 90(1): F36 - F40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. J. Bouwmeester, B. J. Anderson, D. Tibboel, and N. H. G. Holford
Developmental pharmacokinetics of morphine and its metabolites in neonates, infants and young children
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2004; 92(2): 208 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. H. P. Simons, M. van Dijk, K. S. Anand, D. Roofthooft, R. A. van Lingen, and D. Tibboel
Do We Still Hurt Newborn Babies?: A Prospective Study of Procedural Pain and Analgesia in Neonates
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2003; 157(11): 1058 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
P. C. Walker and D. S. Wagner
Treatment of Pain in Pediatric Patients
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, August 1, 2003; 16(4): 261 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. J. Bouwmeester, J. N. van den Anker, W. C. J. Hop, K. J. S. Anand, and D. Tibboel
Age- and therapy-related effects on morphine requirements and plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites in postoperative infants
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2003; 90(5): 642 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. W. B. Peters, H. M. Koot, J. B. de Boer, J. Passchier, J. M. Bueno-de-Mesquita, F. H. de Jong, H. J. Duivenvoorden, and D. Tibboel
Major Surgery Within the First 3 Months of Life and Subsequent Biobehavioral Pain Responses to Immunization at Later Age: A Case Comparison Study
Pediatrics, January 1, 2003; 111(1): 129 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. B. Berde and N. F. Sethna
Analgesics for the Treatment of Pain in Children
N. Engl. J. Med., October 3, 2002; 347(14): 1094 - 1103.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.