Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, C.
Right arrow Articles by Wildsmith, J. A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, C.
Right arrow Articles by Wildsmith, J. A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 6 805-807
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section with bupivacaine 5 mg ml–1 in glucose 8 or 80 mg ml–1

C. Connolly, G. A. McLeod and J. A. W. Wildsmith

University Department of Anaesthesia, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK*Corresponding author

The standard spinal preparation of bupivacaine contains a high concentration of glucose (80 mg ml–1). However, the addition of only a small amount of glucose (8 mg ml–1) to plain solutions of bupivacaine results in a solution which, although no more than marginally hyperbaric, produces a more predictable block when used for spinal anaesthesia in non-pregnant patients. However, bupivacaine 5 mg ml–1 in glucose 8 mg ml–1 has a density [1.00164 (SD 0.00008) at 37°C] which is relatively greater than that of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of the pregnant patient at term (1.0003 at 37°C) because CSF density decreases during pregnancy. Therefore, a double-blind, randomized, controlled study was carried out to compare intrathecal bupivacaine (glucose 8 mg ml–1) with bupivacaine (glucose 80 mg ml–1) in 40 pregnant patients at term. Although there was no difference between groups in onset of sensory block, dose of ephedrine or patient satisfaction, patients receiving bupivacaine (5 mg ml–1) with glucose (8 mg ml–1) had persistently higher sensory blocks between 60 and 120 min after intrathecal injection, suggesting that the spread of spinal solutions in the pregnant patient at term is not dependent on density.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 805–7


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. Rofaeel, S. Lilker, S. Fallah, E. Goldszmidt, and J. Carvalho
Intrathecal plain vs hyperbaric bupivacaine for labour analgesia: efficacy and side effects: [Bupivacaine intrathecale pure vs hyperbare pour l'analgesie du travail obstetrical : efficacite et effets secondaires]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2007; 54(1): 15 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Hocking and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Intrathecal drug spread
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 568 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. A McLeod
Density of spinal anaesthetic solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with and without dextrose
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2004; 92(4): 547 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. T. Warren and D. J. Kopacz
Spinal 2-Chloroprocaine: The Effect of Added Dextrose
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 95 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.